2020
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking and strategic planning to enhance small and medium‐sized enterprises growth in a less competitive economy

Abstract: Competition and day‐to‐day firefighting prevents small businesses from undertaking the most effective types of strategic planning and networking for growth and innovation. Poor or inappropriate execution of these activities highlights the need for targeted managerial training. Potential explanations for the weak growth of many SMEs focus on the limited use of strategic planning and networking activities. Data from a management survey of SMEs in South East Wales shows that where these activities are undertaken … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been confirmed that the situation in the V4 countries does not differ significantly from other regions. These findings are in line with Clifton et al (2020). They demonstrated that strategic planning and networking are not implemented adequately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been confirmed that the situation in the V4 countries does not differ significantly from other regions. These findings are in line with Clifton et al (2020). They demonstrated that strategic planning and networking are not implemented adequately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This is confirmed by empirical studies conducted in different geographical areas (Kocisova et al, 2018). Clifton et al (2020) conducted research in a group of 121 SME companies in South East Wales. The authors asked various questions related to strategic planning in the following areas: (a) Business objectives, (b) Company growth, (c) Skills and training, (d) Innovation, (e) Networking, (f) Business prospects and drivers of growth.…”
Section: Theoretical Partmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In the same type of configuration, with low working capital and a high working capital turnover, the presence of low growth prospects (having a high book-to-market ratio; in our coding, the higher "growth prospect" variable set value is indicative of lower growth prospects) suggests that the construction company has extensive capability to manage the introduction of new processes and innovations and capitalize on the developments. The need for low growth prospects suggests that the greater risks of radical innovations would be compounded, and the firm is more suited to select the incremental innovations in this configuration for the positive outcomes [41]. From the perspective of firm performance as evaluated by the stock market reaction, these outcomes likely suggest that investors place a high value on the safety and lack of risk from this type of approach, rather than expectations of greater future financial benefits.…”
Section: Cradical*~fswc*fswct Cradical*fswc*~fswctmentioning
confidence: 99%