2015
DOI: 10.22401/jnus.18.2.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Polymeric Ion Selective Electrode for Determination of Sulfamethoxazole in Pure and Pharmaceutical Samples

Abstract: Sulfamethoxazole ion selective electrodes were constructed based on sulfamethoxazoletengestophosphoric acid as ion pair complex in a polyvinylchloride matrix and plasticized by four plasticizers, Di-octyl phthalate (DOPH); Tri-butyl phosphate (TBP); Acetophenone (AP) and Nitrobenzene (NB). Sulfamethoxazole electrodes (E1, E2, E3 and E4) gave slopes (52.008, 58.381, 56.909 and 50.309 mV/decade) and linear ranges from (1×10 -5 -1×10 -2 ,1×10 -7 -1×10 -2 ,1×10 -5 -1×10 -2 and 1×10 -5 -1×10 -2 M) respectively. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows the comparison between the (normal spectrum) and the (direct method) of ISE using the F-test using a 95% confidence level and this table show standard deviation (δ n1 ) for five measurements where F  S12/S22, where S1 ˃ S2 and F Table equal 6.39 and from the calculations it found F Calculate is less than F Table, and thus, there is no difference in precision between the two methods. Sulfamethoxazole potentiometric determination in pharmaceutical preparations and the data obtained for pharmaceutical samples were listed in Table 4 [14]. RSD: Relative standard deviation, RSD***% for n  2, t  12.7, RSD**% for n  3, t  4.3, RSD*% for n  5, t  2.7, Re%:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the comparison between the (normal spectrum) and the (direct method) of ISE using the F-test using a 95% confidence level and this table show standard deviation (δ n1 ) for five measurements where F  S12/S22, where S1 ˃ S2 and F Table equal 6.39 and from the calculations it found F Calculate is less than F Table, and thus, there is no difference in precision between the two methods. Sulfamethoxazole potentiometric determination in pharmaceutical preparations and the data obtained for pharmaceutical samples were listed in Table 4 [14]. RSD: Relative standard deviation, RSD***% for n  2, t  12.7, RSD**% for n  3, t  4.3, RSD*% for n  5, t  2.7, Re%:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone healing assessment was histopathology done by using a grading system to evaluate the healing process of the bone defects. The grading system was previously used by several researchers (Kim et al, 2004;Maeda et al 2007;Abrahem and Al-Soudani, 2012;Elgendy et al, 2013). This grading system was based on the degree of tissue response in relation to inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and the presence of osteoid tissue.…”
Section: Histopathological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion-pair complexes have been used as ionophores for fabrication of PVC membrane based ion-selective electrode. Phosphotungstate, tetra phenyl borate, , phosphomolybdate, tungstophosphate, tetrakis (4-chlorophenyl) borate, and silicotungstate were used as counterions in the fabrication of PVC based ion-selective membranes. There is no report available for direct potentiometric determination of lansoprazole involving ion-selective electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%