1986
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092160403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomenclatural review of long digital forelimb flexors in carnivores

Abstract: A hitherto-unknown atavistic muscle in the dog initiated a review of the literature on the homologies and nomenclature of the forelimb flexors in carnivores and man. A consequence is that we recommend a revision of the nomenclature in the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (Ithaca, New York, 1983) so that it is in agreement with the Nomina Anatomica (Wilkins, Baltimore, 1983). This revision mainly consists of the incorporation of the terms M. palmaris longus and Mm. flexores breves manus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, some comparative inferences about these muscles should be interpreted with caution. Spoor & Badoux (1986b) argued that the variety in the development of the long digital forelimb flexors in carnivorans represents the various intermediate stages between the morphology in man and in the dog, and proposed some changes in the nomenclature to better determine the correct homologies. However, in the present study it was preferred to adopt the official nomenclature for domestic mammals (ICVGAN ) because it has didactic advantages when comparing L. gymnocercus with domestic dog.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some comparative inferences about these muscles should be interpreted with caution. Spoor & Badoux (1986b) argued that the variety in the development of the long digital forelimb flexors in carnivorans represents the various intermediate stages between the morphology in man and in the dog, and proposed some changes in the nomenclature to better determine the correct homologies. However, in the present study it was preferred to adopt the official nomenclature for domestic mammals (ICVGAN ) because it has didactic advantages when comparing L. gymnocercus with domestic dog.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These receive the names of flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus, but their position (superficial, intermediate, or deep) with respect to the third muscle and the palmar carpal ligament varies. Homology is best inferred from their relations to each other and the palmar carpal ligament (Spoor and Badoux, 1986), in which case they are easily homologized to similar muscles in reptiles. One muscle passes superficial to the ligament (palmaris longus) and the remaining two pass deep (superficial and deep digital flexors).…”
Section: Glade Cete Linnaeus 1758mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this description closely resembled that given by Miller et al (1993) for M. interflexorii in dog. In this concern, Spoor and Badoux (1986) in dog proposed homology of M. interflexorii with the human M. flexor digitorum superficialis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%