2015
DOI: 10.1108/hff-04-2014-0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of flow field around the race car in case

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the flow field structure around the race car in two cases: stationary wheel and rotating wheel. In addition, this paper also illustrates and clarifies the influence of wheel rotation on the aerodynamic characteristics around the race car. Design/methodology/approach – The author uses steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with the Realizable k-ε mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vehicle surface resolution ranges from 4 to 8 mm, and there are 15 prism layers generated nearest to the vehicle; the thickness of the first layer is 0.0001 m to obtain the wall Yþ < 1 for LES simulation, as shown in Figure 4. The cell number will affect the simulation results, so the grid independence is performed with several different mesh configurations with their wall normal resolution of Y þ < 1 (Hamut et al, 2014;Dang et al, 2015). The simulation results are listed in Table I (Figure 4).…”
Section: Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehicle surface resolution ranges from 4 to 8 mm, and there are 15 prism layers generated nearest to the vehicle; the thickness of the first layer is 0.0001 m to obtain the wall Yþ < 1 for LES simulation, as shown in Figure 4. The cell number will affect the simulation results, so the grid independence is performed with several different mesh configurations with their wall normal resolution of Y þ < 1 (Hamut et al, 2014;Dang et al, 2015). The simulation results are listed in Table I (Figure 4).…”
Section: Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error of the aerodynamic drag between the calculation and wind tunnel test is less than 2%, which demonstrates high calculation precision; thus, the numerical calculation method can be applied to the following research work. 30…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error of the aerodynamic drag between the calculation and wind tunnel test is less than 2%, which demonstrates high calculation precision; thus, the numerical calculation method can be applied to the following research work. 30 Figure 5 presents the pressure distribution of the Ahmed model on the symmetric plane. On the model top surface, the pressure coefficients measured by the simulation and wind tunnel test are almost indistinguishable.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, steady RANS has been reported as still being the most used and accepted approach in vehicle industry (Diasinos et al ., 2015). Therefore, steady-state analysis is conducted in this research work as this remains the preferred approach in academia and in industry (Defraeye et al ., 2010; Diasinos et al ., 2014; Dang et al ., 2015; Diasinos et al ., 2017). The solution is set as implicit and a finite volume method is used to solve RANS equation (McManus and Zhang, 2005).…”
Section: Computer-simulated Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%