2016 IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing &Amp; Its Applications (CSPA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2016.7515834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object classification and recognition using Bag-of-Words (BoW) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking back over the last two decades of detection methods, until the early 2010s the limitations on computing resources, datasets, and the mostly theoretical nature of DNN development had led to employing traditional detectors, such as DPM [106], Selective Search [107], Oxford-MKL [108], HOG [109], NLPR-HOGLBP [110], SIFT [111], VJ Det [112], Bag of Words [113], etc. A modular data-flow diagram and a historical publication timeline of these popular detectors are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Review Of Cnns For Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking back over the last two decades of detection methods, until the early 2010s the limitations on computing resources, datasets, and the mostly theoretical nature of DNN development had led to employing traditional detectors, such as DPM [106], Selective Search [107], Oxford-MKL [108], HOG [109], NLPR-HOGLBP [110], SIFT [111], VJ Det [112], Bag of Words [113], etc. A modular data-flow diagram and a historical publication timeline of these popular detectors are depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Review Of Cnns For Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "part filters" compute features two times of the spatial resolution of the "root filter". Here "root filter" [94], [102], object recognition [103], text classification [104], image retrieval [105] • quite simple to comprehend and implement [94] • can categorize the objects [94] • computationally expensive [95] • skips geometric relationships among visual words [96] • less annotation accuracy [97] SPM object recognition [106], image classification [98], [107] • computationally effective [98] • improves the classification accuracy [98] • weight's mechanism is not sophisticated [99] • insufficient discriminative power [100] BOVW scene classification [108], [108], land-use classification [109], object classification [110] • improves the classification accuracy [108] • visual vocabulary's computational cost is high [111] behaves similar to a Dalal-Triggs method. The outcome of this method at a specific point and scale in a picture is the result of the "root filter" on the window plus the sum over parts, of the limit over positions of that component, of the "part filter" record on the coming from sub-window minus the cost of deformation.…”
Section: F Deformable Part Model (Dpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bag of Words method was selected to conduct image classification because of its simplicity, maturity and practical performance (Nowak et al, 2006) in various applications. In addition, classifying different objects is one of the main objectives of this system, and recent studies have proven that Bag of Words is an effective and robust approach to object classification (Ali et al, 2016;Hannat et al, 2016;Vyas et al, 2016;Ergene and Durdu, 2017;Nguyen-Hoang et al, 2017;Unlu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Image Classification With Bag Of Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%