2001
DOI: 10.1109/55.924846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the mobility versus drain current relation for a nanoscale MOSFET

Abstract: The dependence of the linear and saturated drain current of a nanoscale MOSFET on the near-equilibrium, inversion layer mobility of a long-channel device from the same technology is examined. Simple expressions developed from a scattering theory of the MOSFET provide a quantitative relation between the long-channel mobility and the short-channel drain current. The theory explains the commonly observed mobility-dependence of the linear and saturated drain currents in present-day deep submicron MOSFETs, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7(c)-(d), but it can also change the direction of propagation of one of the two low particles created through the decay of a high energy phonon, thus reducing the current magnitude. This is known as backscattering 45 . While the first effect (additional channels) does not depend on the Si length, the second one (backscattering) increases with L Si , explaining the current characteristics in Fig.…”
Section: B Homogeneous Si Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(c)-(d), but it can also change the direction of propagation of one of the two low particles created through the decay of a high energy phonon, thus reducing the current magnitude. This is known as backscattering 45 . While the first effect (additional channels) does not depend on the Si length, the second one (backscattering) increases with L Si , explaining the current characteristics in Fig.…”
Section: B Homogeneous Si Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Gate delay as a function of gate length calculated from transient simulations (labeled 'turn on') and Q/I eff for the InGaAs devices labeled "type 7" in the top panel and for a similarly scaled Si device. Note how, compared to its 'poor' performance estimated from the current drive, InGaAs now outperforms Si, since its lower gate (inversion) capacitance now reduces Q (or, equivalently, the capacitive load) source [31]) force us to revisit some of the assumptions usually made when attempting to understand the basic principles controlling carrier transport in nanometer-scale devices, as exemplified by the 'virtual source' model [32][33][34][35] (also often refereed to as the 'top-of-the-barrier' or the 'backscattering' model, we'll simply call it here the 'virtual source' model).…”
Section: Revisiting the 'Virtual Source Model'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Possibly the most significant assumption is the independence of λ on (1) the boundary conditions both upstream and downstream from the virtual source and (2) the possible inhomogeneity in the L-layer (whatever this might be) and, therefore, its relation to the low-field mobility [33]. The implications of these concepts to the future VLSI technology are quite obvious.…”
Section: Assumptions and Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the ON-state characteristics of a transistor are also related to their effective mobility [49], [50], the electron mobility reduction due to IRS at low drain bias should be understood in relation with the ON-current reduction at high drain bias. The low-field effective mobility in NWFETs is calculated from the electron density and the conductance using the expression [32], [33] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%