On the planned environment and neighbourhood life:
            <i>Evidence from mixed-tenure housing developments twenty years on</i>

Casey, Rionach; Coward, Sarah; Allen, Chris; Powell, Ryan

doi:10.3828/tpr.78.3.4

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10 peer-reviewed journal articles (Atkinson & Kintrea, 2000Camina & Wood, 2009;Casey et al, 2007;Graham et al, 2009;Kearns & Mason, 2007;Manzi & Bowers, 2004;Middleton et al, 2005;Thompson-Fawcett, 2004;van Ham & Manley, 2009); . 2 books (Jupp, 1999;Ramwell & Saltburn, 1998); .…”

Section: Overview Of the Studies Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Primary studies: report (Atkinson & Kintrea, 1998) and journal paper (Atkinson & Kintrea, 2000); report (Groves et al, 2003) and journal paper (Middleton et al, 2005); report (Allen et al, 2005) and two journal papers (Camina & Wood, 2009;Casey et al, 2007). .…”

Section: Overview Of the Studies Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…social capital, urban regeneration) but presenting evidence on mixed tenure effects (N studies ¼ 7, N references ¼ 8). Among 15 studies focussing on the question of what is achieved through tenure diversification, 10 studies aimed to look at 'outcomes', 'effects', 'results', 'influence' or 'impact' of tenure diversification (Andrews & Reardon Smith, 2005;Atkinson & Kintrea, 1998, 2000Beekman et al, 2001;Jupp, 1999;Kintrea et al, 1996;Page & Boughton, 1997;Pawson et al, 2000;Rowlands et al, 2006;Tunstall & Coulter, 2006;Wood & Vamplew, 1999), and 5 studies aimed to focus on 'perceptions' or 'experiences' of mixed tenure, and the 'contribution' and 'facilitating role' of tenure diversification (Allen et al, 2005;Camina & Wood, 2009;Casey et al, 2007;Cole et al, 1997;Harding, 1997;Meen et al, 2005;Silverman et al, 2005).…”

Section: Overview Of Study Aims and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mixed tenure is a key feature of UK housing and regeneration policy. Following an earlier review-of-reviews pertaining to mixed tenure effects (Bond et al., 2011), this paper presents a systematic review of the UK evidence published between 1999 and 2005. The majority of the available evidence is cross-sectional, mostly derived from modest-quality case-study research across nearly 100 sites, supplemented by a very few secondary studies using national data. Six broad domains of outcomes have been investigated across 27 studies. Some positive impacts of mixed tenure were found in the social and residential domains, though notably without impacts on social capital. The evidence for mixed tenure effects in the environmental, safety and economic domains is very mixed. In the human capital domain of health and education, the evidence is sparse. A stronger theoretical base (including the assessment of causal mechanisms) is required to guide future research on mixed tenure effects, which should be longer term and longitudinal in nature, using comparison case studies and secondary data.

show abstract

Section: Overview Of the Studies Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of the Studies Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of Study Aims and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Changing Social Housing Policy in the Context of Neoliberalism

Wang¹,

Gu²

2023

The Urban Book Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Parallel Lives: Towards a Greater Understanding of What Mixed Communities Can Offer

Camina

Wood²

2009

Urban Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The creation of mixed communities has become a key element of UK housing policy but empirical research in such areas is limited. Through interviews with and diaries kept by residents of three mature estates, planned as mixed tenure from the start, levels of neighbourhood usage and social interaction are analysed. The techniques used deliberately replicate earlier work in mixed-tenure regeneration areas. While giving some support to the conventional wisdom that owners and renters tend to live separate lives, the distinctions are not as strong as previously suggested and the estates studied differ from each other. Explanations are drawn from both physical planning and community development. The authors indicate the parameters needed for such developments to meet residents' aspirations and draw out the lessons for policy.

show abstract

On the planned environment and neighbourhood life: Evidence from mixed-tenure housing developments twenty years on

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009

Mixed Evidence on Mixed Tenure Effects: Findings from a Systematic Review of UK Studies, 1995–2009

Changing Social Housing Policy in the Context of Neoliberalism

Parallel Lives: Towards a Greater Understanding of What Mixed Communities Can Offer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About