2013
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online solutions and the ‘Wallacean shortfall’: what does GBIF contribute to our knowledge of species' ranges?

Abstract: Aim To investigate the contribution to range filling, range extent and climatic niche space of species of information contained in the largest databank of digitized biodiversity data: the global biodiversity information facility (GBIF). We compared such information with a compilation of independent distributional data from natural history collections and other sources. Location Europe. Methods We used data for the hawkmoths (Lepidoptera, family Sphingidae) to assess three aspects of range information: (1) obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of computer hardware and Internet speed, the current availability of species and climate information sharing systems has greatly enhanced the field of SDM [19][20][21][22]. These have greatly inspired the use of a variety of algorithms for predicting the potential distribution of species.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the development of computer hardware and Internet speed, the current availability of species and climate information sharing systems has greatly enhanced the field of SDM [19][20][21][22]. These have greatly inspired the use of a variety of algorithms for predicting the potential distribution of species.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 32,674 specimens (32,434 from GBIF and 240 from CVH) were identified by the coordinates recorded in the database or by coordinates derived from a place name included in the database. The main reason for collating records with a coarse geographic resolution (0.5° × 0.5°) was that there may have been a sampling bias or error at a fine resolution in the GBIF and CVH occurrence records, which would produce models of lower rather than higher quality [21]. Another consideration was the calculation speed of the computer, identified in many previous studies, which was based on a spatial resolution between 50 km × 50 km and 200 km × 200 km [20,21,36].…”
Section: Species Occurrence Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, various datasets have been developed or collated in an attempt to provide baseline information on the current distributional range of invasive or exotic species at a regional or continental scale (Beck et al 2013). An inevitable downside of such datasets is that their accuracy is biased towards areas and time periods with a high collection intensity (Kalwij et al 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%