Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3219166.3219195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Data Acquisition for Statistical Estimation

Abstract: We consider a data analyst's problem of purchasing data from strategic agents to compute an unbiased estimate of a statistic of interest. Agents incur private costs to reveal their data and the costs can be arbitrarily correlated with their data. Once revealed, data are verifiable. This paper focuses on linear unbiased estimators. We design an individually rational and incentive compatible mechanism that optimizes the worst-case mean-squared error of the estimation, where the worst-case is over the unknown cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , (c n , z n ) and the internal randomness of the mechanisms M. Roth and Schoenebeck [2012] and Chen et al [2018a] have also considered the design of joint survey and estimation mechanism for statistical estimation. The main differences between their model and our model are: (1) they assume the marginal cost distribution is known to the data analyst, while our data analyst doesn't have such information, (2) they have the same survey mechanism for all individuals, while we consider an online setting where the analyst can adaptively change the survey mechanism, and (3) they only consider the estimation of mean, while we also investigate the estimation of confidence intervals.…”
Section: Truthfulness In Expectationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. , (c n , z n ) and the internal randomness of the mechanisms M. Roth and Schoenebeck [2012] and Chen et al [2018a] have also considered the design of joint survey and estimation mechanism for statistical estimation. The main differences between their model and our model are: (1) they assume the marginal cost distribution is known to the data analyst, while our data analyst doesn't have such information, (2) they have the same survey mechanism for all individuals, while we consider an online setting where the analyst can adaptively change the survey mechanism, and (3) they only consider the estimation of mean, while we also investigate the estimation of confidence intervals.…”
Section: Truthfulness In Expectationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we first show that we can easily extend known results on one-shot truthful mechanisms to achieve truthfulness and individual rationality for a sequence of survey mechanisms M. Then, we introduce the formulation proposed by Chen et al [2018a] for obtaining the optimal unbiased estimator of population mean when the cost distribution is known to the analyst. Later in Section 5 we will use this known cost case as our benchmark for evaluating the performance of our optimal unbiased estimator when the cost distribution is unknown.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is also a large body of work in related models where information has a price [28,10,32,25,14,1,13,12]. Finally, as discussed in the introduction, the works in [33] and [37] are directly relevant to this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%