2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT'07) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iat.2007.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Solution Stability in Dynamic, Distributed Constraint Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The worst case runtime, communication, and memory requirements of these two algorithms to solve the DCOP at each time step are the same as those of DPOP, as they use DPOP as a subroutine 7. The full name of the algorithm was not provided by Petcu and Faltings (2007b). to update the Q-and R-values. The exception is that agents in the Distributed Q-learning algorithm also broadcast their value assignments at each time step to all other agents.…”
Section: Rs-dpopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worst case runtime, communication, and memory requirements of these two algorithms to solve the DCOP at each time step are the same as those of DPOP, as they use DPOP as a subroutine 7. The full name of the algorithm was not provided by Petcu and Faltings (2007b). to update the Q-and R-values. The exception is that agents in the Distributed Q-learning algorithm also broadcast their value assignments at each time step to all other agents.…”
Section: Rs-dpopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in case the problems have highly induced width, the messages generated in the high-width areas of the problem become too large. There have been proposed a number of variations of this algorithm that address this problem and other issues, offering various tradeoffs (see Petcu and Faltings 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2005d, 2005e, 2005f, 2006. Petcu and Faltings (2005a) propose an approximated version of this algorithm, which allows the desired tradeoff between solution quality and computational complexity.…”
Section: Privacy-preserving Collaborative Optimization: Theoretical Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is extended to map over-constrained problems into DCOP but can handle only static problems as the author concedes to the lack of an effective DCOP algorithm for dynamic problems. Petcu et al [10] [11] propose S-DPOP and RS-DPOP, which utilize self stabilizing DFS trees to guarantees optimal solution stability in distributed continuous-time combinatorial optimization problems. Lass et al [12] deal with the complicating factor of dynamism by wrapping ADOPT in an Adapter that receives and handles dynamic event requests.…”
Section: Solving Dynamic Complex Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%