2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.042314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal unambiguous discrimination of quantum states

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topic of quantum state discrimination was firmly established in the 1970s by the pioneering work of Helstrom [2], who considered a minimum error discrimination of two known quantum states and unambiguous state discrimination was originally formulated and analyzed by Ivanovic, Dieks, and Peres [3,4,5] in 1987. [6] In this paper, we deal with minimum-error discrimination discrimination. We will use convex optimization [7] as a tool for reaching this aim, which has many other different applications where some of them have been seen in previous papers [6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The topic of quantum state discrimination was firmly established in the 1970s by the pioneering work of Helstrom [2], who considered a minimum error discrimination of two known quantum states and unambiguous state discrimination was originally formulated and analyzed by Ivanovic, Dieks, and Peres [3,4,5] in 1987. [6] In this paper, we deal with minimum-error discrimination discrimination. We will use convex optimization [7] as a tool for reaching this aim, which has many other different applications where some of them have been seen in previous papers [6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] In this paper, we deal with minimum-error discrimination discrimination. We will use convex optimization [7] as a tool for reaching this aim, which has many other different applications where some of them have been seen in previous papers [6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USD is possible if and only if the initial states are linearly independent [9]. When N ≥ 3, some special cases were investigated in finding the optimal solutions [10][11][12][13]. Recently, USD was studied by means of a geometric view [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Very recently, based on unambiguous discrimination, the topic of extracting information from a qubit by multiple observers has been studied [17,18]. Most of the existing results about optimal unambiguous discrimination were derived in the POVM formalism [12,19,20], which can be realized by introducing ancillary systems and performing von Neumann measurements on systems and the ancillas. The present work and previous studies [9][10][11]18] investigating unambiguous quantum state discrimination by using the language of system-ancilla provides a way to understand the roles of quantum correlations in the quantum information process.…”
Section: Lf Xu Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the solution of |η i for the absence of entanglement in state ρ SA is not unique, we choose the ones satisfying the equations (17)(18)(19)(20), which provides a uniform treatment to the four cases of priori probabilities and overlap. Since the GMQD is not normalized to one and its value for maximally entangled qutrit-qubit states is 0.5, we plot the quantity 2D G (ρ SA ) for the case with equal a priori overlaps in Fig.…”
Section: Lf Xu Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%