2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing immobilization on two-dimensional carboxyl surface: pH dependence of antibody orientation and antigen binding capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
69
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown previously, the efficiency of antibody immobilization depends on several parameters, such as buffer pH, antibody concentration, ionic strength and reaction time. Thus, increased immobilization efficiency can be achieved in a buffer with low ionic strength and pH close to but smaller than the isoelectric point (pI) of the antibody (Pei et al 2010;Pillet et al 1994). Because the pI of the capture antibody, MA-IFX20G2, used in this study was unknown, buffers with low ionic strength (10 mM sodium acetate buffer) and with pH ranging from pH 4.5 to pH 5.5 were tested for covalent immobilization of this antibody at three different concentrations (10, 20 and 40 g/ml).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown previously, the efficiency of antibody immobilization depends on several parameters, such as buffer pH, antibody concentration, ionic strength and reaction time. Thus, increased immobilization efficiency can be achieved in a buffer with low ionic strength and pH close to but smaller than the isoelectric point (pI) of the antibody (Pei et al 2010;Pillet et al 1994). Because the pI of the capture antibody, MA-IFX20G2, used in this study was unknown, buffers with low ionic strength (10 mM sodium acetate buffer) and with pH ranging from pH 4.5 to pH 5.5 were tested for covalent immobilization of this antibody at three different concentrations (10, 20 and 40 g/ml).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the NH 2 of MNP@CS was activated by EDC/NHS as shown in Scheme 1. The observed phenomenon was likely caused by activation of azelaic acid, EDC and NHS, for which the surface charges changed due to the presence of the positively charged amino groups of succinimide, according to a study on aminemodified magnetic nanoparticles (Pei et al, 2010). Qiao et al (2011) reported conjugation of catecholamine on magnetic nanoparticles coated with sulfonated chitosan, where a negatively charged state of HSO 3 CS DMSA@MNPs became positively charged due to NH 3 + R form of the catecholamine in surface.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Activated Cs@mnp Nanoparticlementioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, a high percentage of physically immobilized antibodies can be denatured [8][9][10], and sometimes fewer than 3% of the binding sites remain functional [11]. It is widely accepted that the stable and oriented immobilization of proteins such as antibodies can greatly enhance analyte detection and/or capture [12][13][14][15][16]. A variety of coating and/or linker materials may functionalize surfaces, enhancing the stability, orientation and function retention of immobilized proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%