2003
DOI: 10.1109/led.2003.813363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Schottky S/D offset for 25-nm dual-gate CMOS performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower capacitance value for the SB MOSFETs is linked to the presence of the SB as aforementioned, to the quantum effects, and also to the greatly reduced overlap capacitances, as discussed in [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower capacitance value for the SB MOSFETs is linked to the presence of the SB as aforementioned, to the quantum effects, and also to the greatly reduced overlap capacitances, as discussed in [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Doped source-drain devices require that the gate overlaps the source and drain extensions in order to confine carriers close to the channel, preventing current flow in low-doped higher resistivity regions and reducing current drive [10]. In contrast, optimum performance in SB MOSFETs is obtained with gate "underlap," which results in lower capacitance [11]. In addition, quantum effects in the inversion layer of modern thin-oxide devices have been shown to lower the gate capacitance, particularly when the substrate is low doped as in the present SB MOSFET [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, other alternatives are required to further improve the performance of SB-MOSFETs. Different studies [7][8] demonstrate that the source and drain regions in SB-MOSFETs must be separated an underlap length, L un , from the gate contact, contrary to the overlap length inherent to conventional MOSFETS. Therefore, this is a key quantity in the SB-MOSFET topology, and its optimization represents a potential way of improving the overall device performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the gate has poor control over this part of the channel an underlap will result in an increased potential barrier at the gate edges. In SB devices the underlap can cause a larger performance degradation than for doped SID devices since the barrier width increases as the coupling to the gate is decreased [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%