Optimizing the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Remote Community Infrastructure

Abstract

Remote communities such as rural villages, post-disaster housing camps, and military forward operating bases are often located in remote and hostile areas with limited or no access to established infrastructure grids. Operating these communities with conventional assets requires constant resupply, which yields a significant logistical burden, creates negative environmental impacts, and increases costs. For example, a 2000-member isolated village in northern Canada relying on diesel generators required 8.6 million USD of fuel per year and emitted 8500 tons of carbon dioxide. Remote community planners can mitigate these negative impacts by selecting sustainable technologies that minimize resource consumption and emissions. However, the alternatives often come at a higher procurement cost and mobilization requirement. To assist planners with this challenging task, this paper presents the development of a novel infrastructure sustainability assessment model capable of generating optimal tradeoffs between minimizing environmental impacts and minimizing life-cycle costs over the community’s anticipated lifespan. Model performance was evaluated using a case study of a hypothetical 500-person remote military base with 864 feasible infrastructure portfolios and 48 procedural portfolios. The case study results demonstrated the model’s novel capability to assist planners in identifying optimal combinations of infrastructure alternatives that minimize negative sustainability impacts, leading to remote communities that are more self-sufficient with reduced emissions and costs.

Tools for Measuring Energy Sustainability: A Comparative Review

“…Economic sustainability is achieved if the system offers a profitable and affordable energy supply in the present and the future. This is possible considering the cost of recovering the power supply potential, the operational costs imposed on users, and the need for financial support for the system [53].…”

Competitive Advantage Evaluation Model of Sustainable Housing Design

“…For example, energy saving awareness, carbon reduction goals, and the use of green materials are currently viewed as residents' social responsibilities [15,16]. Moreover, the evaluation of cost-optimal solutions for sustainable housing design is also a major mission at present, because it will directly affect the developing effectiveness of sustainable housing [17,18]. Therefore, we must consider the economic, environmental and social issues from sustainable housing design, in order to achieve the long-term sustainable results equally [19].…”

The Impact of Renewable Energy on Sustainable Economic Growth in Vietnam

“…Overall, profitability and affordability are the 2 indicators which complement each other to ensure the sustainability of the supply system (Schau et al, 2011;Filer et al, 2020). 3.…”