2018
DOI: 10.1177/2229411218762044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs among Intellectually Disabled in Madurai

Abstract: The aim of the study was to assess the oral health status and treatment needs among intellectually disabled (ID) people in Madurai city. Objectives: To evaluate the oral health status and treatment needs among ID people in Madurai city. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 133 ID people obtaining training at special schools in Madurai. After obtaining the parental consent of the participants, oral health was assessed using World Health Organization (WHO) proforma 1997 and oral hygie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two reviewers (co-first authors) appraised inclusion studies with the Joanna Briggs Institute 2017 critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies (Table S3) (Supplementary Materials). The following eight criteria were used: (1) the criteria for inclusion in the sample were clearly defined; (2) the study subjects and the setting were described in detail; (3) the exposure was measured in a valid and reliable way; (4) objective, standard criteria were used to measure the condition; (5) confounding factors were identified; (6) strategies to deal with confounding factors were stated; (7) the outcomes were measured in a valid and reliable way; and (8) appropriate statistical analysis was used. The risk of bias of articles was appraised using the ROBINS-E tool (University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) (Table S4) (Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Identified Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two reviewers (co-first authors) appraised inclusion studies with the Joanna Briggs Institute 2017 critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies (Table S3) (Supplementary Materials). The following eight criteria were used: (1) the criteria for inclusion in the sample were clearly defined; (2) the study subjects and the setting were described in detail; (3) the exposure was measured in a valid and reliable way; (4) objective, standard criteria were used to measure the condition; (5) confounding factors were identified; (6) strategies to deal with confounding factors were stated; (7) the outcomes were measured in a valid and reliable way; and (8) appropriate statistical analysis was used. The risk of bias of articles was appraised using the ROBINS-E tool (University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) (Table S4) (Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Identified Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special needs children are individuals under the age of 18 who have either physical or cognitive disabilities, including intellectual disability (ID), Down Syndrome (DS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy (CP), epilepsy (EP), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [ 1 ]. They have oral health problems similar to those of normal children, such as dental caries, poor oral hygiene, periodontal disease, and malocclusion [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates, individuals with disabilities comprise 10% of the population in developed countries and 12% in developing countries [1] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A person who has mental mentally disabled is 4.38, which categorized as bad (Peter et al, 2017). Research in Madurai, India showed that of 133 respondents who were mentally disabled, 31.6% experience periodontal disease, 49.6% experience dental caries, 39.1% having poor dental and oral hygiene (Dheepthasri et al, 2018). Azzahra et al (2014) research at SDLB C Dharma Wanita Persatuan in South Borneo showed that oral hygiene index of mentally disabled at range 8 -15 years old were good (29,1%), medium (66,7%), and bad (4,2%) (Azzahra et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%