2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ore-body imaging by crosswell seismic waveform inversion: A case study from Kambalda, Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Downhole seismic surveys such as side scan, VSP and mine seismic profiling (MSP), and in-mine seismic surveys are best suited for imaging steeply dipping to subvertical structures (e.g., Price, 1974;Cosma, 1983;Wong et al, 1983Wong et al, , 1984Gustavsson et al, 1984;Galperin, 1985;Peterson et al, 1985;Spathis et al, 1985;Harman et al, 1987;Mutyorata et al, 1987;Duncan et al, 1989;Juhlin et al, 1991;Sinadinovski et al, 1995;Frappa and Moinier, 1993;Cao and Greenhalgh, 1997;Greenhalgh and Bierbaum, 1998;Urosevic and Evans, 2000;Greenhalgh et al, 2000Greenhalgh et al, , 2003Wong, 2000;Adam et al, 2003;Cosma et al, , 2007Perron et al, 2003;Bellefleur et al, 2004aBellefleur et al, , 2004bXu and Greenhalgh, 2010). They have typically higher resolution than surface seismic data, which make them attractive for delineating fracture and fault zones for mine planning or as a complement to surface seismic surveys.…”
Section: Seismic Methods For Mineral Exploration Wc175mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downhole seismic surveys such as side scan, VSP and mine seismic profiling (MSP), and in-mine seismic surveys are best suited for imaging steeply dipping to subvertical structures (e.g., Price, 1974;Cosma, 1983;Wong et al, 1983Wong et al, , 1984Gustavsson et al, 1984;Galperin, 1985;Peterson et al, 1985;Spathis et al, 1985;Harman et al, 1987;Mutyorata et al, 1987;Duncan et al, 1989;Juhlin et al, 1991;Sinadinovski et al, 1995;Frappa and Moinier, 1993;Cao and Greenhalgh, 1997;Greenhalgh and Bierbaum, 1998;Urosevic and Evans, 2000;Greenhalgh et al, 2000Greenhalgh et al, , 2003Wong, 2000;Adam et al, 2003;Cosma et al, , 2007Perron et al, 2003;Bellefleur et al, 2004aBellefleur et al, , 2004bXu and Greenhalgh, 2010). They have typically higher resolution than surface seismic data, which make them attractive for delineating fracture and fault zones for mine planning or as a complement to surface seismic surveys.…”
Section: Seismic Methods For Mineral Exploration Wc175mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the new discoveries are located at depths between 500 m and 2000 m. At these depths, the costs of drilling increase dramatically and the ability of the drill-holes to accurately sample the mineralization decreases, such that increased depth of drilling limits the quality of the information. High resolution geophysical methods such radio-frequency (0.1 − 5 MHz) electromagnetic methods (Fullagar et al, 2000), borehole radar tomography (Bellefleur and Chouteau, 2001;Zhou and Fullagar, 2001) or seismic tomography (Enescu et al, 2002;Wong, 2000;Xu and Greenhalgh, 2010) provide the geologist with new information that can be incorporated into the process of orebody modeling. In addition, it has been shown that sonic logs can be used to constrain seismic tomography between drill-holes, resulting in a significant increase in the accuracy of the tomographic images Perozzi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mora (1989) reveals the insight that inversion can be interpreted as a composite of a tomography and a migration to recover the low-and high-wavenumber parts of the model, respectively. Here, we distinguish between full-waveform inversion (FWI) and full-waveform tomography (FWT), which are often confused as being the same (Xu and Greenhalgh, 2010;Köhn et al, 2012). FWI tries to recover the complete wavenumber information using the full wavefields including phases and amplitudes, whereas FWT reconstructs the low-wavenumber velocities using predominantly phase (or traveltime) information rather than amplitude information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%