“…In what follows, my aim is to show how we can open up different paths into Comte’s writings, paths that may help to reanimate many of his underappreciated insights into the tangle of knowledge and life, science and substance, human and natural history. It is worth noting that in recent years, there has been a gradual but marked revival of ‘Comte studies’, a movement spearheaded by the efforts of such thinkers as Mary Pickering (1993, 2009), Michel Bourdeau (2018), Andrew Wernick (2015, 2017), Robert Scharff (2002), Mike Gane (2006) and Ryan McVeigh (2020). The collective contribution of these scholars offers rare yet eloquent interpretations of Comte and his aspirations for developing a philosophy, history, politics and sociology of science – well before ‘positivism’ became such a bad word.…”