Tectonics - Recent Advances 2012
DOI: 10.5772/48194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleoseismological Three Dimensional Virtual Photography Method; A Case Study: Bağlarkayası-2010 Trench, Tuz Gölü Fault Zone, Central Anatolia, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this region, Kürçer & Gökten (2012) found evidence for 2 M~6 earthquakes revealed in a paleoseismic trench and inferred a recurrence interval of ~5 kyr. These observations support our findings of very limited seismic activity along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone during the Holocene.…”
Section: Holocene Deformation Along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zonementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this region, Kürçer & Gökten (2012) found evidence for 2 M~6 earthquakes revealed in a paleoseismic trench and inferred a recurrence interval of ~5 kyr. These observations support our findings of very limited seismic activity along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone during the Holocene.…”
Section: Holocene Deformation Along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zonementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, when we recalculated their vertical displacement rate on the segment for the last 3 Ma, we obtained a very close result to our findings. According to Özsayın et al (2013), the vertical displacement rate of Kürçer and Gökten (2012) should be recalculated. They point out that Akhisar is located on a step-over zone where two segments of the TGFZ overlap and where a slip rate of 0.053 mm/year can thus be inferred for the eastern fault branch in the zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our findings and observations in the Ecemiş Fault Zone are very local, taken together with other observations of first‐order tectonic structures in Central Anatolia [ Erol , ; Görür et al ., ; Yetiş and Demirkol , ; Koçyiğit , ; Dirik and Göncüoğlu , ; Koçyiğit and Beyhan , ; Çemen et al ., ; Koçyiğit et al ., , ; Jaffey and Robertson , ; Dirik and Erol , ; Koçyiğit , ; Özsayın and Dirik , ; Ocakoğlu and Açıkalın , ; Özsayın and Dirik , ; Doğan , ; Fernández‐Blanco et al , ; Genç and Yürür , ; Kürçer and Gökten , ; Yildirim , ; Çiner et al ., ; Gürbüz and Kazancı , ] and the Taurides, [ Cosentino et al ., ; Schildgen et al ., , , ], they contribute to some regional implications. In the interior of Central Anatolia, structural and GPS data reveal predominantly extension with localized strike‐slip faulting during the Quaternary [ Şengör et al ., ; Çemen et al ., ; Jaffey and Robertson , ; Özsayın and Dirik , ; Ocakoğlu and Açıkalın , ; Genç and Yürür , ; Doğan , ; Kürçer and Gökten , ; Özsayın et al ., ; Aktuğ et al ., ; Gürbüz and Kazancı , ], in agreement with our observations. Structural and geomorphic indicators of extension are especially prominent along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone [ Çemen et al ., ; Koçyiğit , ; Kürçer and Gökten , ; Özsayın et al ., ; Gürbüz and Kazancı , ], which is a conjugate structure of the Central Anatolian Fault Zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interior of Central Anatolia, structural and GPS data reveal predominantly extension with localized strike‐slip faulting during the Quaternary [ Şengör et al ., ; Çemen et al ., ; Jaffey and Robertson , ; Özsayın and Dirik , ; Ocakoğlu and Açıkalın , ; Genç and Yürür , ; Doğan , ; Kürçer and Gökten , ; Özsayın et al ., ; Aktuğ et al ., ; Gürbüz and Kazancı , ], in agreement with our observations. Structural and geomorphic indicators of extension are especially prominent along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone [ Çemen et al ., ; Koçyiğit , ; Kürçer and Gökten , ; Özsayın et al ., ; Gürbüz and Kazancı , ], which is a conjugate structure of the Central Anatolian Fault Zone. Genç and Yürür [] and Aktuğ et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%