2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13010-018-0068-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients and agents – or why we need a different narrative: a philosophical analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe success of medicine in the treatment of patients brings with it new challenges. More people live on to suffer from functional, chronic or multifactorial diseases, and this has led to calls for more complex analyses of the causal determinants of health and illness.MethodsPhilosophical analysis of background assumptions of the current paradigmatic model.ResultsWhile these factors do not require a radical paradigm shift, they do give us cause to develop a new narrative, to add to existing narratives… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies found that the answers to these questions are variable and contextually dependent, with multiple factors such as trust in clinician, newness or severity of symptoms, or confidence, all affecting the preferences in real time. This shows that the relationship between social factors, rationality and individual's desire to be involved in making choices is complex (Walach and Loughlin 2018). Thus, there is never going to be a one-sizefits all model for the relationship between autonomy and paternalism (Carrard et al 2016).…”
Section: Digital Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies found that the answers to these questions are variable and contextually dependent, with multiple factors such as trust in clinician, newness or severity of symptoms, or confidence, all affecting the preferences in real time. This shows that the relationship between social factors, rationality and individual's desire to be involved in making choices is complex (Walach and Loughlin 2018). Thus, there is never going to be a one-sizefits all model for the relationship between autonomy and paternalism (Carrard et al 2016).…”
Section: Digital Companionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we argue that the language‐game of rights is at the core of the domain of the attitudes and practices of respect . So, the new principle of respectful care can be employed by practitioners as a new imperative moral language‐game, a moral know‐how that should govern the health care practices in this new era of taking care of people not merely as patients , but as agents (that is, persons ) …”
Section: A Wittgensteinian Moral Epistemology: On the Grammar Of Respectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the new principle of respectful care can be employed by practitioners as a new imperative moral language-game, a moral know-how that should govern the health care practices in this new era of taking care of people not merely as patients, but as agents (that is, persons). [16][17][18]…”
Section: A Wittgensteinian Moral Epistemology: On the Grammar Of Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Rather, their incorporation into our thinking and planning of health and social care is essential if we are to respond adequately to the problems that confront us: they need to be seen not as "ethical add-ons" but core components of any genuinely integrated, realistic, and conceptually sound account of health care practice. [8][9][10][11][12][13] As reported in the most recent philosophy thematic edition of this journal, 14 researchers are rising to this challenge, to develop accounts of these key ideas with substantive import and application. To do so effectively requires not only extensive empirical work to understand and adequately characterize perspectives previously ignored or marginalized [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] but also a fundamental conceptual shift in our understanding of the nature of and relationships between knowledge, evidence, value, patient experience, and the social context of care, as well as the social context of research and all forms of knowledge production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%