2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PCR-RFLP for authentication of different species of processed snappers using mitochondrial D-loop region by single enzyme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods also exhibit some limitations, such as complex procedures, poor stability, and poor reproducibility (Chapela et al, 2007;Larraín, Díaz, Lamas, Uribe, & Araneda, 2014;Rasmussen & Morrissey, 2009). The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique, which was developed based on fingerprinting technology, is most widely used for species identification because of its simple procedure, low cost, and good reproducibility (Sivaraman et al, 2018;Wilwet, Jeyasekaran, Shakila, Sivaraman, & Padmavathy, 2018). Moreover, it just needs PCR thermocycler and electrophoresis apparatus, which means most laboratories could bear the cost, that is also a realistic factor in most developing countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods also exhibit some limitations, such as complex procedures, poor stability, and poor reproducibility (Chapela et al, 2007;Larraín, Díaz, Lamas, Uribe, & Araneda, 2014;Rasmussen & Morrissey, 2009). The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique, which was developed based on fingerprinting technology, is most widely used for species identification because of its simple procedure, low cost, and good reproducibility (Sivaraman et al, 2018;Wilwet, Jeyasekaran, Shakila, Sivaraman, & Padmavathy, 2018). Moreover, it just needs PCR thermocycler and electrophoresis apparatus, which means most laboratories could bear the cost, that is also a realistic factor in most developing countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teknik PCR-RFLP (polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism) adalah metode yang paling cocok untuk autentikasi berbagai seafood yang dapat memfasilitasi lembaga inspeksi makanan untuk menegakkan peraturan pelabelan dan meminimalkan penipuan seafood (Sivaraman et al, 2018). Keunggulan utama PCR-RFLP adalah tekniknya sederhana, cepat, kuat, dan murah dibandingkan dengan barcode DNA menggunakan sekuensing mtDNA (Anjalia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Di lain sisi, spesies L. sanguineus dan L. erythopterus dibedakan dengan enzim restriksi endonuklease MaeII, karena profil RFLP dari dua spesies ini tidak bisa dibedakan dengan HaeIII, ScaI dan SnaBI (Zhang et al, 2006). Berdasarkan penelitian Sivaraman et al (2018), PCR-RFLP dengan menargetkan gen D-loop pada sembilan spesies kakap memberikan pola yang serupa pada spesies L. fulvus dan L. fulviflamma karena kesamaan identitas yang tinggi (94%), sedangkan tujuh spesies lainnya termasuk spesies kakap merah (L. argentimaculatus dan L. gibbus) dapat diferensiasi dengan jelas menggunakan enzim Tsp509I yang dipilih berdasarkan analisis in silico (WATCUT) dan laporan beberapa penelitian sebelumnya yang terbukti mampu membedakan spesies.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…In RFLP, after PCR amplification, target DNA is digested using enzymes, and the resulting restriction profiles are monitored by gel electrophoresis, so the profiles of different samples can be compared . Recently, 5 tuna species, 9 different snapper species, and 16 commercial sea cucumber species have been discriminated by PCR-RFLP targeting mitochondrial regions. An RFLP approach was also used for detecting cat-meat contents as low as 0.01% in mixtures and meatballs . In spite of being one of the techniques most frequently used, RFLP analyses and the use of other classical DNA markers suffer from being unsuitable for obtaining reliable quantitative information.…”
Section: Classical Dna Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%