2020
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.244-255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pembadanan Hukum Fintech Sebagai Instrumen Pengaturan Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat

Abstract: Revolusi Industri 4.0. melahirkan Financial Technology (Fintech) sebagai paradigma baru di bidang jasa keuangan merupakan akselerasi pemberian pinjaman dana dengan memanfaatkan proses otomatis dan menyederhanakan proses pinjaman. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membadankan Hukum Fintech sebagai instrumen pengaturan persaingan usaha yang sehat. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal/normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Data dikumpulkan dengan studi kepustakaan, dianalisis secara kualitatif. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case (Handayani & Sulistiyono, 2020) explained that the Industrial Revolution 4.0 was what gave birth to Financial Technology (Fintech) as a new paradigm in the field of financial services, namely accelerating the provision of loan funds by utilizing automated processes and simplifying the loan process. Weak legal instruments have an impact on the occurrence of unfair business competition, one of which is in the form of a cartel.…”
Section: Analysis Of Crime and Punishment In Sentencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case (Handayani & Sulistiyono, 2020) explained that the Industrial Revolution 4.0 was what gave birth to Financial Technology (Fintech) as a new paradigm in the field of financial services, namely accelerating the provision of loan funds by utilizing automated processes and simplifying the loan process. Weak legal instruments have an impact on the occurrence of unfair business competition, one of which is in the form of a cartel.…”
Section: Analysis Of Crime and Punishment In Sentencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy is seen from the lack of legal standing of the AFPI's authority to regulate, especially the main tasks and functions of regulating and supervising interest rates are not actually under the authority of the AFPI. 34 a. Illegal Fintech Lending Development According to the Financial Services Authority (OJK) records, there were 1,026 illegal fintech companies in 2020.…”
Section: Fintech Lending Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest cartels in the financial sector are a form of conspiracy mechanism determining loan interest rates by business actors. 32 In the case of peer-to-peer fintech, it needs to be emphasized that there is no evidence that AFPI is engaged in an interest cartel. However, the current conditions and regulations for peer-to-peer fintech in Indonesia provide sufficient space for AFPI to undertake such actions.…”
Section: Cartels In Peer-to-peer Lending Business Activities In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 99%