2017
DOI: 10.24854/jpu22015-37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pengaruh Dyadic Coping terhadap Kepuasan Pernikahan Pada Pasangan Menikah di Tangerang

Abstract: Abstract-Marital satisfaction is one of the important topics in marital researchAbstrak-Kepuasan pernikahan merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam penelitian tentang pernikahan, karena kepuasan pernikahan banyak mempengaruhi kestabilan pernikahan. Salah satu faktor mempengaruhi kepuasan pernikahan adalah dyadic coping. Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh positive dan negative dyadic coping pada kepuasan pernikahan. Data didapatkan dari 115 pasangan. Analisa data dipandu oleh Actor-Partner Interdependence Model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A less popular model is the 3/1-dimensional model, which consists of three total scores from self/perceived partner's stress communication, positive and negative DC, and one total score from common DC items (Rapelli et al, 2021). In Indonesian sample, researchers use a total score by summing the 35 items, but excluding the satisfaction with coping items (Rumondor et al, 2021) or use both positive and negative DC scores (Aditya & Magno, 2011;Dermawan et al, 2015). However, no empirical evidence supports this DCI factor structure, especially in Indonesia.…”
Section: Factor Structure Of the DCImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A less popular model is the 3/1-dimensional model, which consists of three total scores from self/perceived partner's stress communication, positive and negative DC, and one total score from common DC items (Rapelli et al, 2021). In Indonesian sample, researchers use a total score by summing the 35 items, but excluding the satisfaction with coping items (Rumondor et al, 2021) or use both positive and negative DC scores (Aditya & Magno, 2011;Dermawan et al, 2015). However, no empirical evidence supports this DCI factor structure, especially in Indonesia.…”
Section: Factor Structure Of the DCImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increasing number of dual-earner marriages in Indonesia, and the well-documented detrimental impact of stress on marital satisfaction (see Randall & Bodenmann, 2017 for a review), it is crucial to understand how DC may buffer the negative impact of external stress on the marital satisfaction of the dual-earner couple in Indonesian context. Indeed, early evidence based on studies of DC in Christian couples (Aditya & Magno, 2011) and couples from Tangerang city (Dermawan et al, 2015) suggests perceptions of partners' positive DC were associated with higher reports of marital satisfaction. Despite this initial evidence, a validated self-report measure of DC in Bahasa Indonesia is not currently available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selama ini penelitian mengenai relationship maintenance behavior telah dilakukan walaupun masih terbatas dalam hubungan jarak dekat dan satuan unit analisis individual (Stafford & Canary, 1991;Dermawan, Goei, & Kirana, 2017). Penelitian pada pasangan yang menjalani hubungan jarak jauh diperlukan untuk memperluas pemahaman mengenai relationship maintenance behavior dan hubungan jarak jauh itu sendiri karena selama ini, masih belum banyak yang diketahui mengenai relationship maintenance behavior dan hubungan jarak jauh (Pistole et al, 2010).…”
unclassified