2018
DOI: 10.25217/numerical.v2i2.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) berbantuan Pendekatan Investigasi terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis

Abstract: Mathematical communication ability of learners is still relatively low, this is allegedly caused by the conventional learning model that is still applied by educators. The authors in this study apply cooperative type model of TPS assisted investigative approach, because the type and approach is expected to be suitable to improve the mathematical communication ability of learners. The purpose of this research is to see the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share (TPS) assisted by an Investiga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagram above the researcher also focuses on the 3 lowest student responses, namely suggestive (S), Justificational (JT) and Sumarizing (CO), of the three lowest student responses illustrates that learning in the cycle students have not been able to come up with ideas or ideas as suggestions related to the topic learning so that it impacts on confirming or criticizing the opinions of other groups and summarizes some of the information conveyed. This is supported by research from (Fahrullisa et al, 2018) who got the results that the TPS learning model can foster students' mathematical communication skills. After the second cycle, the students worked on the worksheets to determine the level of completeness or the percentage of completeness.…”
Section: Analisis Respon Siswa Pembelajaran Matematika Siklus IImentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diagram above the researcher also focuses on the 3 lowest student responses, namely suggestive (S), Justificational (JT) and Sumarizing (CO), of the three lowest student responses illustrates that learning in the cycle students have not been able to come up with ideas or ideas as suggestions related to the topic learning so that it impacts on confirming or criticizing the opinions of other groups and summarizes some of the information conveyed. This is supported by research from (Fahrullisa et al, 2018) who got the results that the TPS learning model can foster students' mathematical communication skills. After the second cycle, the students worked on the worksheets to determine the level of completeness or the percentage of completeness.…”
Section: Analisis Respon Siswa Pembelajaran Matematika Siklus IImentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, the learning process in the classroom will be more meaningful. Think Pair Share is also a very good active learning, if implemented correctly, it will save the teacher's time in explaining, help students discuss and participate more, and provide a cumulative assessment of student progress (Fahrullisa et al, 2018;Ladimiyanto, 2014;Yoserizal & Rahmi, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dan pada tahap share meminta peserta didiknya untuk menyampaikan atau mengkomunikasikan hasil dari diskusi mereka dengan peserta didik lainnya di depan kelas. (Fahrullisa, Putra, and Supriadi 2018). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think pair share (TPS) dirancang dengan tujuan agar siswa lebih terlatih untuk berkomunikasi dalam rangka mengungkapkan berbagai gagasan selama proses pembelajaran, baik kepada guru maupun sesama siswa.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Hal ini sejalan dengan pendapat Allen dan Tanner yang mengatakan TPS memungkinkan siswa memanfaatkan sebaik-baiknya waktu tunggu untuk mempertajam logika berfikir dari permasalahan atau pertanyaan yang diberikan guru. Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran kooperatif model TPS membantu siswa meningkatkan: hasil belajar dan memberikan pengaruh lebih baik dibandingan konvensional (Raditya et al, 2015;Handayani & Yanti, 2017;Muthoharoh, 2017); Memecahkah masalah (Zulfah, 2017); dan Komunikasi matematis (Abdi & Hasanuddin, 2018;Fahrullisa et al, 2018).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified