2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc129708v1922016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perception of Socio-Environmental Conflicts in Mining Areas: The Case of the Mirador Project in Ecuador

Abstract: In order to analyse the socio-environmental conflicts it is essential to pay attention to people's perception, because environmental problems can lead to different forms of conflict according to local economic and socio-cultural context. The main objective of this research is to determine the perception of the public about the different socio-environmental conflicts in the area of influence of the Mirador Project, the first project of large-scale mining in Ecuador. To do so, a representative sample of the gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This risk of essentialism is warned against, for example, in research on Shuar attitudes towards Mirador (Leifsen et al., 2017: 38–41). However, contrary to the ethnographic record, scholars also present the Shuar as having an affinity with communalist and ecological views, for example, by claiming that collective land tenure is rooted in the ‘cosmovision’ of the Shuar (Sánchez‐Vázquez et al., 2017: 31) and that ‘a utilitarian and individualist logic’ is absent from Shuar culture (Verdú Delgado, 2017: 16). In fact, historically speaking, the Shuar and neighbouring peoples had little concept of fixed territory and owned land neither individually nor communally (Harner, 1972: 179).…”
Section: Anti‐extractivism and Political Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This risk of essentialism is warned against, for example, in research on Shuar attitudes towards Mirador (Leifsen et al., 2017: 38–41). However, contrary to the ethnographic record, scholars also present the Shuar as having an affinity with communalist and ecological views, for example, by claiming that collective land tenure is rooted in the ‘cosmovision’ of the Shuar (Sánchez‐Vázquez et al., 2017: 31) and that ‘a utilitarian and individualist logic’ is absent from Shuar culture (Verdú Delgado, 2017: 16). In fact, historically speaking, the Shuar and neighbouring peoples had little concept of fixed territory and owned land neither individually nor communally (Harner, 1972: 179).…”
Section: Anti‐extractivism and Political Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sitting directly downstream from the mine, Yanua is more vulnerable to water pollution than Churubia. Is this a specifically Indigenous concern, based on a non‐modern ontology or ‘cosmography’ (Sánchez‐Vázquez et al., 2017: 31)? For Facundo, the question of extraction was a very modern one of weighing the material risks and benefits from specialized productive activity.…”
Section: Shuar Mining and Modern Politics In South‐east Ecuadormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the environment in the region is threatened by huge direct and/or indirect impacts on the whole ecosystem. Some are very common and evident in mining areas such as land changes [45,49], destruction of grasslands [19,50], rivers and sources pollution [51], destruction of agricultural areas, and the decrease of its productions [46,52], and so on, negatively affecting the means of subsistence of the populations, causing the scarcity of certain essential resources (water, food) and degrading (decreasing) the quality of life in the whole region. This statement on the tensions surrounding conflicts linked to mining activities has been mentioned by the community leader in Kolaboui and reported by PACV as following:…”
Section: For Bauxite Mining Boxing Sites: To Whom Is the Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study performed in Ecuador on the conflicts associated with mining operations showed that the population fears the possible social and environmental impact in the long run. Therefore, it is necessary to be aware of people's perceptions since environmental problems can lead to different forms of conflict according to the economic and socio-cultural context of the affected location [25]. It is necessary to inform the population about the risks and benefits of the activity and the public hearing, in this case, becomes the link between the miner and the community.…”
Section: The Public Hearing As An Instrument To Promote Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%