“…An important action taken toward the remedy of this situation has been the development of courses and programs specifically designed for Spanish HSs. From the early claims made by Guadalupe Valdés and colleagues in the 1970s and 1980s advocating for SHL-specific pedagogies, the articulation of these educational alternatives has been characterized by an array of resources and perspectives, most notably the following: (1) the application of sociolinguistically informed curricula (e.g., Beaudrie, Ducar, & Potowski, 2014;Potowski & Lynch, 2014;Shin & Hudgens Henderson, 2017), (2) the implementation of principles of critical pedagogy and social justice (e.g., Abbott, 2018;Correa, 2011;Leeman, 2005;Leeman & Serafini, 2016), (3) the adoption of flexible approaches to language use (e.g., García, 2009;Shohamy, 2011;Prada & Nikula, to appear), (4) the inclusion of service learning or other forms of community engagement (e.g., Lowther Pereira, 2016; Pascual y Cabo, Prada, & Lowther Pereira, 2017), and (5) the attention and centralization of socioaffective factors, such as the notion of identity formation in the design and implementation of HL courses/programs (e.g., Hornberger & Wang, 2008;Ducar, 2008;Leeman, 2015;Parra, 2016;Potowski, 2012;Sánchez-Muñoz, 2016;Carreira & Beeman, 2014;Wilson & Martínez, 2011;Wilson & Ibarra, 2015). 3 The increasing trends in the implementation of such programs and courses in K-12 and postsecondary contexts across the country reflect the dynamics within the Hispanic community itself, which shows promising advances in areas such as education, employment, and linguistic vitality of Spanish (Krogstad, 2016).…”