2009
DOI: 10.1002/tax.584013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic relationships of diploid and polyploid species inLudwigiasect.Isnardia(Onagraceae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNAs

Abstract: Ludwigia, a genus with rampant interspecific hybridization, is an ideal model for examining the impact of gene introgression and polyploidization on species diversification. We examined the evolution of the Ludwigia sect. Isnardia, which is a polyploid complex (x = 8) of five species distributed in North America. The phylogeny of L. sect. Isnardia was reconstructed based on sequences of cpDNA atpB­rbcL intergenic spacer and nrITS (internal transcribed spacer). Most L. sect. Isnardia species are polyphyletic at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on his study of floral anatomy, Eyde (1981) was the first to propose that Ludwigia formed a distinct evolutionary lineage sister to the rest of the family, and his hypothesis has been confirmed by subsequent research (Raven, 1988;Hoch & al., 1993), including molecular studies (Bult & Zimmer, 1993;Conti & al., 1993Conti & al., , 1996Levin & al., 2003Levin & al., , 2004Berry & al., 2004;Berger & al., 2016). However, these and other molecular studies (e.g., Hung & al., 2009;Armitage & al., 2013;Ghahramanzadeh & al., 2013) were generally limited in scope, and the present study presents the first comprehensive phylog eny of the genus Ludwigia. Raven (1963) presented the first synopsis of the entire genus Ludwigia, recognizing 17 sections, 11 of them new, and nine from the Old World.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Based on his study of floral anatomy, Eyde (1981) was the first to propose that Ludwigia formed a distinct evolutionary lineage sister to the rest of the family, and his hypothesis has been confirmed by subsequent research (Raven, 1988;Hoch & al., 1993), including molecular studies (Bult & Zimmer, 1993;Conti & al., 1993Conti & al., , 1996Levin & al., 2003Levin & al., , 2004Berry & al., 2004;Berger & al., 2016). However, these and other molecular studies (e.g., Hung & al., 2009;Armitage & al., 2013;Ghahramanzadeh & al., 2013) were generally limited in scope, and the present study presents the first comprehensive phylog eny of the genus Ludwigia. Raven (1963) presented the first synopsis of the entire genus Ludwigia, recognizing 17 sections, 11 of them new, and nine from the Old World.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In total, three noncoding regions of cpDNA, i.e., trnE-trnT, trnT-trnL spacers, and trnL intron (Baumel et al, 2002;Taberlet et al, 2007;Melotto-Passarin et al, 2008), nad intron of mtDNA (Soria-Hernanz et al, 2008), and fourteen regions of nuclear DNA (thirteen genes and one nrDNA spacer) were amplified and sequenced. Genes AGAMOUS (AG), gamma carbonic anhydrase (CA), chalcone isomerase (CHI), chalcone synthase (CHS), CONSTANS-LIKE 2 (CO2), cryptochrome 2 gene R (Cry2), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (Dfr), ethylene forming enzyme (EFE), flavanone-3-hydroxylase (F3h), ferulic acid 5-hydroxylase (Fah), LEAFY, PISTILLATA (PIS), Feregulated transporter-like protein (ZIP) and nuclear ribosomal internal spacers (nrITS) (El-Assal et al, 2001;Olsen et al, 2004;Ramos-Onsins et al, 2004;Masuzaki et al, 2006;Flowers et al, 2009;Hung et al, 2009). The annotated A. thaliana genome from The Arabidopsis Information Resource database [TAIR; (Rhee et al, 2003)] was used to design primers to amplify the targeted regions.…”
Section: Sampling and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, botanists generated numerous phylogenetic hypotheses based on molecular data with organelle noncoding spacers or nuclear DNA introns (Slowinski and Page, 1999;Savolainen et al, 2000;Chiang et al, 2006;Hung et al, 2009). Besides, multilocus analyses that assess the genetic divergence within and between sister species also provide genealogical information for inferring the phylogeography (Stadler et al, 2005;Wright and Gaut, 2005;Zhu et al, 2007;Zou et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In plant systematics, NCPs have become one of the most commonly used tools in elucidating species relationships, especially so in groups with complex evolutionary histories involving hybridisation, polyploidy and/or introgression, where plastid gene trees are used as baseline data for resolving true species trees due to their uniparental inheritance [11][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%