2010
DOI: 10.4308/hjb.17.1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic Study of Mangifera laurina and its Related Species Using cpDNA trnL-F Spacer Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The species of M. laurina had the longest horizontal branch (0.74762) and it also showed the longest genetic distance with other species of Mangifera (Table 3). This supported the statement of Fitmawati and Hartana (2010) that M. laurina was the common ancestor of Mangifera in Indonesia. Mangifera kemanga, M. foetida and Mangifera sp.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of Mangiferasupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The species of M. laurina had the longest horizontal branch (0.74762) and it also showed the longest genetic distance with other species of Mangifera (Table 3). This supported the statement of Fitmawati and Hartana (2010) that M. laurina was the common ancestor of Mangifera in Indonesia. Mangifera kemanga, M. foetida and Mangifera sp.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of Mangiferasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This finding was similiar to Hou (1978) which stated that M. laurina was the synonym of M. indica. However, Fitmawati and Hartana (2010), also used trnL-F intergenic spacer for Mangifera from Sulawesi, did not agree with that statement and stated that M. laurina was different species from M. Indica, also, M. laurina was the ancestor for M. indica which is the cultivated form of M. laurina. This result also contrasts with the previous study using ITS sequence (Fitmawati et al 2016) which stated that M. odorata has a close relationship with M. foetida.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of Mangiferamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sequence variations found in cpDNA sequences were generally caused by mutations in a single nucleotide which represents mutation that was present and had happened for a very long period of time (Fitmawati and Hartana 2010). In certain regions, the difference in length sequences of trnL-F was caused by mutations (Borsch et al 2003), although the amount of change in this sequence was very small compared to the changes in the core genome, but was able to provide important information in describing the process of evolution because cpDNA was inherited maternally or uniparentally where the changes in the nucleotide took place for a very long time (Hancock 2003), in contrast to the changes on nucleotide base occurred in the core of DNA which were recombination of both parents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Vijeberg and Bachmann 1999). Another research about the use of trnL-F region in land plants and suitable to provide a phylogenetic information in Junacaeae (Drabkova 2004) and Mangifera had been conducted by Fitmawati and Hartana (2010) for Mangifera laurina and related species and by Dinesh et al (2015) for Mangifera indica relatives. But for mango Sumatra, especially in Northern Sumatra, has not been done yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%