2002
DOI: 10.1080/0735-260291044386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phytoremediation in Wetland Ecosystems: Progress, Problems, and Potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a reduced condition, most of the metal often binds to sulfides in the sediment. This form of metals is unavailable to plant uptake (Weis & Weis, 2004;Williams, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a reduced condition, most of the metal often binds to sulfides in the sediment. This form of metals is unavailable to plant uptake (Weis & Weis, 2004;Williams, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal dynamics in salt marshes may be influenced by the composition of plant communities (Williams, 2002;Windham et al, 2003). Recent investigations demonstrate that concentrations of metals in plant tissues are highly variable between species (Fitzgerald, Caffrey, Nesaratnam, & McLoughlin, 2003;Ye, Baker, Wong, & Willis, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in the removal efficiency of As in solution along with high concentrations of the metalloid showed the viability of using the phytoremediation technique, mainly in environments with medium to low pollutant concentration (Schnoor, 1997;Lasat, 2002;Pilon-Smits & Pilon, 2002;Williams, 2002;Tsao, 2003;Pilon-Smits, 2005).…”
Section: Symptomatologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although abundant biomass production was a desirable characteristic for remediation Potential of macrophytes for removing atrazine from aqueous solution purposes (Cunningham & Ow, 1996;Williams, 2002;Pilon-Smits & Pilon, 2002;Pilon-Smits, 2005), if the removal efficiency were the same for the three species, the use of the plant that produced less biomass could be recommended. Thus, the use of A. caroliniana and L. gibba would be indicated to remedy environments with concentrations of 0.1 mg L -1 atrazine in the water, because they produced less fresh mass.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Atrazine Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to point out that the remediation efficiency of atrazine in solution decreased with the increase in the concentration of the pollutant in the environment, thus showing the efficiency of using the phytoremediation technique for environments with low to medium contamination (Cunningham & Ow, 1996;Garbisu & Alkorta, 2001;Williams, 2002;Tsao, 2003;Suresh & Ravishankar, 2004;PilonSmits, 2005).…”
Section: Atrazine Absorption By Aquatic Macrophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%