2014
DOI: 10.2174/1389201015666140915152706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Bioadhesive Microdevices: A New Technology for Oral Drug Delivery

Abstract: The oral route is the most convenient and least expensive route of drug administration. Yet, it is accompanied by many physiological barriers to drug uptake including low stomach pH, intestinal enzymes and transporters, mucosal barriers, and high intestinal fluid shear. While many drug delivery systems have been developed for oral drug administration, the physiological components of the gastro intestinal tract remain formidable barriers to drug uptake. Recently, microfabrication techniques have been applied to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biochemical adhesion utilizing high-affinity interactions between a targeting ligand and specific moieties can provide highly specific binding to the small intestine or diseased tissue. However, one drawback to the use of biomolecules and other surface modifications to promote adhesion is degradation as a result of the low pH of the stomach and proteolytic and metabolic enzymes throughout the GI tract [63]. Therefore, molecular stability must be considered for surface modification of oral drug delivery platforms.…”
Section: Strategies To Increase Micro/nanofabricated Oral Drug Delmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical adhesion utilizing high-affinity interactions between a targeting ligand and specific moieties can provide highly specific binding to the small intestine or diseased tissue. However, one drawback to the use of biomolecules and other surface modifications to promote adhesion is degradation as a result of the low pH of the stomach and proteolytic and metabolic enzymes throughout the GI tract [63]. Therefore, molecular stability must be considered for surface modification of oral drug delivery platforms.…”
Section: Strategies To Increase Micro/nanofabricated Oral Drug Delmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsystems for oral drug delivery are designed in such a manner so as to maximise their residence time in the gastrointestinal track and provide unidirectional release of drugs towards the intestinal epithelium and also regulate the release of drugs in a sustained manner. These properties make such devices important for not only improving the drug permeation but also improving its solubility and causing the degradation of drugs in such a way which makes them highly effective [23], [24]. Hence, the use of microdevices for oral drug delivery improves this mechanism by leaps and bounds and abolishes most of the barriers associated with oral drug delivery.…”
Section: Oral Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the movement of drugs is properly regulated into the blood stream, thus, preventing any harsh effects of the drugs on the patient and hence such systems lead to the improvement in the patient compliance. Physiological barriers to oral drug delivery (Adapted from [23]). …”
Section: Oral Drug Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these tissues have numerous chemical and physical defensive barriers, such as degradative enzymes, harsh pH conditions, tight junctions, and a mucus layer to prevent the entry of unwanted substances. 14,44,50,51 The mucus layer has a quick turnover time of 50–170 min to clear substances that do not directly interact with the cells. 51,52 Because of the viscous and motile nature of the mucus, therapeutic macromolecules take a longer time to diffuse into cells, increasing their susceptibility to degradation and removal.…”
Section: In Vivo Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 Because of the viscous and motile nature of the mucus, therapeutic macromolecules take a longer time to diffuse into cells, increasing their susceptibility to degradation and removal. 50 The Desai group developed nanowire-coated systems to overcome the challenge of mucus layer protection. 14,15,45 NEMPs increase retention time up to 10-fold more than that of unmodified particles and improve device adhesion in vivo, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: In Vivo Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%