Platform design framework: conceptualisation and application

Tura, Nina; Kutvonen, Antero; Ritala, Paavo

doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1390220

Cited by 72 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Standardization of platforms enables better access to partners' knowledge and resources and thus to better EVCC (Tura et al, 2018). In addition, a proper and explicitly designed platform allows firms to grow more symbiotically and systematically (Li, 2009).…”

Section: Efficientarchitecture and Platform Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem Value Creation and Capture: A Systematic Review of Literature and Potential Research Opportunities

Khademi¹

2020

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Efficientarchitecture and Platform Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem Value Creation and Capture: A Systematic Review of Literature and Potential Research Opportunities

Khademi¹

2020

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Regarding the preceding (i.e. the design) phase, less research has been conducted, mainly taking an innovation or engineering view (Tan et al 2016;Tura et al 2018). Tiwana et al (2010), for example, studied the relationships between different platform constituents (such as governance and architecture) during this phase.…”

Section: Lifecycle Of An Mspmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper presents the findings from a 3-year single-case study conducted in connection with the International Data Spaces (IDS) initiative. The IDS represents a multi-sided platform (MSP) for secure and trusted data exchange, which is governed by an institutionalized alliance of different stakeholder organizations. The paper delivers insights gained during the early stages of the platform's lifecycle (i.e. the platform design process). More specifically, it provides answers to three research questions, namely how alliance-driven MSPs come into existence and evolve, how different stakeholder groups use certain governance mechanisms during the platform design process, and how this process is influenced by regulatory instruments. By contrasting the case of an alliance-driven MSP with the more common approach of the keystone-driven MSP, the results of the case study suggest that different evolutionary paths can be pursued during the early stages of an MSP's lifecycle. Furthermore, the IDS initiative considers trust and data sovereignty more relevant regulatory instruments compared to pricing, for example. Finally, the study advances the body of scientific knowledge with regard to data being a boundary resource on MSPs.

show abstract

“…Rietveld and Eggers (2018) explored how the evolution of a platform's user base from one dominated by early adopters to one dominated by late adopters affect performance outcomes for complementary products. Tura, Kutvonen, and Ritala (2018) developed a framework for platform design, involving four elements: 1) platform architecture, 2) value creation logic, 3) governance, and 4) platform competition.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Network Entrepreneurial Platform Leadership Characteristics Model: Based on the Grounded Theory

Pan

Lin

2019

Journal of Business Economics and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the embedding of internet technology, the entrepreneurial model has been gradually developing from traditional single linear channel into network platform with symbiotic multi-platform. Platform leadership is the most important part of the new one and has been caught greatest attention. This paper put forward a new conception of network entrepreneurial platform leadership innovatively. By the integrated use of the Classical Grounded theory, the Procedure Grounded Theory and the Construction Grounded Theory, it adopted the normative research process of open coding, axial coding and selective coding to refine 34 concept—multi-node interactive, cross-level coupling relationship, etc, and formed 11 fundamental categories which include platform leadership power, network organization entrepreneurial mode, etc. Then, we analyzed the interactions between categories, based on which, a double-level and three-type-characteristics model were ultimately built. The study was finished by both two methods of statistical software and manual operation. In order to improve the reliability and validity of the study, it invited another coder to test the category subordination collaboratively, and used matched group to test the theoretical saturation.

show abstract

Platform design framework: conceptualisation and application

Cited by 72 publications

References 51 publications

Ecosystem Value Creation and Capture: A Systematic Review of Literature and Potential Research Opportunities

Ecosystem Value Creation and Capture: A Systematic Review of Literature and Potential Research Opportunities

Designing a multi-sided data platform: findings from the International Data Spaces case

Construction of Network Entrepreneurial Platform Leadership Characteristics Model: Based on the Grounded Theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About