The article puts French scholarship regarding gay and lesbian political participation into international (US and European) perspective, with a focus on homosexual movements, mobilization processes, and electoral behavior. The article draws lessons from the available evidence and identifies several gaps: while homosexual movements have been well covered internationally and to a lesser extent in France, the "micro" level of gay and lesbian individuals has been largely neglected. Individual politicization and voting behavior of LGBT people have received little attention in the US and are absent of European and French political science, delineating a large research agenda. sense given direct links between individual political identities, their construction, and their consequences on political behaviour. Research on the French context has so far mostly but timidly tackled the issues of rights and equality (Lascoumes and Borrillo 2002; Rault 2007; Gross 2010; Perreau 2012), sometimes through a sociolegal lens (Borrillo 1999; Mossuz-Lavau 2002) or analyzed the role of knowledge and expertise over same-sex marriage debate (Stambolis-Ruhstorfer 2020), politicization and party politics (Petitfils 2010; Morabito 2013), and recently political representation (Le Talec 2013; Arambourou et al. 2016; Bouvard 2020). Much of the knowledge produced on France still relies on Phd theses and revolves around mainstream gay and lesbian movement, or the issue of marriage, but even on these topics, research remains scarce in comparison to international scholarship. Other issues including individual political transformations through LGBT activism, elected gays and lesbians, intersectional identities and political strategies, or electoral behavior, are neglected. This heavy focus on LGBT movements rather than on the individual level is for example clear when looking at recent international symposia organized by French or francophone universities to celebrate the 50 th anniversary of Mai 68 or Stonewall 1 . This article completes other states of the art 2 , with a particular focus on the political participation of gays and lesbians. Western countries' ambiguous social context regarding homosexuality matters to political participation. A new norm of "tolerance" has appeared over the last three decades and homosexuality has become more "normal". This is reflected in more liberal attitudes towards homosexuality or same-sex marriage despite persisting differences across countries and social groups (T. W. Smith 2011; Morabito and Reguer-Petit 2013; Ayoub and Garretson 2017; Daniels 2019; Roux 2019). Yet, French research depicts a "paradoxical" situation since the beginning of the 2000s, in which the norm of "tolerance" does not necessarily imply a change in heteronormativity (Broqua and de Busscher 2003; Last_Version_Before_Editing ; Early View: