2014
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2014.253.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism of FUT1 Gene M307 and its Relationship with Partial Immune Indexes and Economic Traits in Yorkshire Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the positive effect of the FUT1 AA genotype was observed in studies on Yorkshire pigs (Zhu et al, 2014). The age of reaching 100 kg of AA genotype pigs was shorter by 4.23 days (P < 0.05) than that of animals with AG genotype, whereas backfat thickness and depth of longissimus dorsi were similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Also, the positive effect of the FUT1 AA genotype was observed in studies on Yorkshire pigs (Zhu et al, 2014). The age of reaching 100 kg of AA genotype pigs was shorter by 4.23 days (P < 0.05) than that of animals with AG genotype, whereas backfat thickness and depth of longissimus dorsi were similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Riis Poulsen et al (2018) found that FUT1 genotype did not affect the growth performance of piglets until 34 d old. The age at 100 kg of AA genotype pigs was shorter than that of AG, whereas BFT and DLD were similar in Zhu et al (2014). Bao et al (2011) indicated that ADG of animals with AA was higher than those of AG and GG types.…”
Section: Genotypic and Allelic Distribution Of Fut1 Genementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, marker-assisted selection might help to control the disease in the targeted population by using preferably animals with genotype AA (Wang et al 2012). The effect of FUT1 genotypes on vital economic traits has been reported (Jiang et al 2005;Bao et al 2011;Zhu et al 2014;Geraci et al 2019), but varying results on the relationship between these genotypes and reproduction and production performances still remain. The gilts with AA genotype grow faster than the AG and GG ones, whereas sows with AA genotype have more piglets born alive than those with AG and GG genotypes (Zhu et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ассоциация этого ДНК-маркера с воспроизводительными признаками подтверждена многочисленными исследованиями как за рубежом (8)(9)(10), так и в нашей стране (11)(12)(13). Косвенное влияние на воспроизводительные качества свиней могут оказывать ДНК-маркеры ECR F18/FUT1 (рецептор Escherichia coli F18/FUT1), генетические варианты которого связывают с устойчивостью к послеотъемной диарее (14,15), и MUC4 (муцин 4) (16), генетические варианты которого ассоциированы с устойчивостью к колибактериозу (17,18). Кроме того, современные программы генетического совершенствования свиней наряду с улучшением воспроизводительных качеств ориентированы на повышение показателей мясной и откормочной продуктивности.…”
unclassified