2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-touch sensing for sequential manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak-to-peak distance error is 31.0 μm at the maximum. On the other hand, the peak-to-peak error of a commercially available TOF sensor is 4 mm(±2 mm) [7]. The peak-to-peak error of our sensor is less than 1/129-th of a commercially available sensor.…”
Section: A Distance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Peak-to-peak distance error is 31.0 μm at the maximum. On the other hand, the peak-to-peak error of a commercially available TOF sensor is 4 mm(±2 mm) [7]. The peak-to-peak error of our sensor is less than 1/129-th of a commercially available sensor.…”
Section: A Distance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, sequential manipulations have been realized by mounting optical time-of-flight (TOF) sensors on a gripper of a PR2 robot [7]. A low-cost ultra-tiny TOF sensor was also developed [8].…”
Section: A Sensor Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Balek and Kelley [15] provide one of the earliest studies on how optical sensors can be integrated into robot grippers for obstacle avoidance, localization, and object recognition. More recent studies of optical based sensors have explored their application to grasping [16] [17] [18], sensor fusion [19] [20] [21], slip detection [22], and sequential manipulation [23]. Compared to other sensing modalities, optical sensors typically provide more accurate measurements over a wider range.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies demonstrate the use of proximity information for pre-grasp alignment and reactive grasping, 22,23 for point-cloud construction of objects 24 and slip detection, 25 and for learning a sequential manipulation task. 26 However, many barriers remain for these sensors to be integrated into self-contained prosthetic hands including the digital communication systems, the multiplexing of multiple sensors, and the wiring of the sensors throughout the device. In particular, none of these proximity sensors can classify spatial position and angular orientation of forces, which ensures that sensory restoration can take place reliably and repeatedly even when the external forces are not centered and/or to the fingertip surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%