2000
DOI: 10.1364/ao.39.000526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precise interferometric length and phase-change measurement of gauge blocks based on reproducible wringing

Abstract: A modern fringe-pattern-analyzing interferometer with a resolution of 1 x 10(-9) and without exclusion of systematic uncertainties owing to optic effects of less than 1 nm was used to test a new method of interferometric length measurement based on a combination of the reproducible wringing and slave-block techniques. Measurements without excessive wringing film error are demonstrated for blocks with nominal lengths of 2-6 mm and with high surface flatness. The uncertainty achieved for these blocks is less tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming polishing for the two sides of the 5-mm block to be equal, we obtain the mean value of the correction p5S13 = -20.06 nm. Comparing this value with the result for the 2-mm block (-20.03 nm) [11], we find that the assumption of equal polishing is reasonable. So, for the 2-mm and 5-mm tungsten carbide blocks wrung to the steel plate the phase change correction on reflection is about -20.04 nm, with the uncertainty level, probably, well below I nm.…”
Section: Interferometric Measurements Without Parallax Errorssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Assuming polishing for the two sides of the 5-mm block to be equal, we obtain the mean value of the correction p5S13 = -20.06 nm. Comparing this value with the result for the 2-mm block (-20.03 nm) [11], we find that the assumption of equal polishing is reasonable. So, for the 2-mm and 5-mm tungsten carbide blocks wrung to the steel plate the phase change correction on reflection is about -20.04 nm, with the uncertainty level, probably, well below I nm.…”
Section: Interferometric Measurements Without Parallax Errorssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…He based the values of phase correction on the measurements of surface roughness determined using both a Talystep profiling instrument and a two-beam interferometer, with further visual analysis of histograms of surface heights measured using the interferometer. Titov [6] presented the slave-gauge technique as a way of reproducible wringing, which is a basis of determining phase correction. Due to the differences in global phase correction declared by different NMIs, EUROMET organized an interregional comparison of the phase correction in the field of gauge block interferometry in 1997 [7].…”
Section: Methods Of Determining Global Phase Correction Based On Lite...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of parallax-free methods in optical interferometry [1][2][3][4], the regime of Nanometrology can be achieved in length measurements of gauge blocks with nominal lengths in the range of 2-6 mm [3][4][5]. This becomes possible both for the measurements on steel or tungsten carbide plates [1,5], and also for doublesided measurements on quartz plates [2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the oblique incidence we have 0.1 nm and 0.2 nm for the aperture correction. It is worthy of note that both of these corrections, together with the corresponding uncertainties, can be further significantly reduced, relative to the illumination regime used in [6,7], by application of the technique of highly collimated laser beams [12,1]. The corresponding procedures were described in detail in [12,1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%