2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting lysine lipoylation sites using bi-profile bayes feature extraction and fuzzy support vector machine algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the detailed information is shown in Tables S1-S6. It is shown that each sample can be calculated by the F-score with the BPB features [78,79], which can be demonstrated in Table 3. With the candidate lengths, we can find that the most available length is 23.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the detailed information is shown in Tables S1-S6. It is shown that each sample can be calculated by the F-score with the BPB features [78,79], which can be demonstrated in Table 3. With the candidate lengths, we can find that the most available length is 23.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Tab. 9, we can find out the model comparison with amino acid composition (AAC) [36], KNN Features, Secondary tendency structure, Bigram [37], Tri gram [38], amino acid factors (AAF) [39], binary encoding (BE), bi-profile bays feature (BPB) [40] and flexible neural tree (LipoFNT) [41]. These methods are mostly used in computational biology.…”
Section: Comparison Analysis Of Our Proposed Methods With Other Feature Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If some of the documents in the k-nearest neighbour belong to the same class, the sum of the class weights of each neighbour in the classification is the similarity between the category and the test document. By sorting the candidate class scores and giving a threshold, the categories of test documents can be determined [27].…”
Section: Commonly Used Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%