2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of total organic carbon at Rumaila oil field, Southern Iraq using conventional well logs and machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect methods involve the utilization of petrophysical well logs and seismic data. A large number of models are reported in the literature for the prediction of geochemical parameters using composite well logs. , , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect methods involve the utilization of petrophysical well logs and seismic data. A large number of models are reported in the literature for the prediction of geochemical parameters using composite well logs. , , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results provide a ranking of the well log data according to their association with the core-measured TOC content. Thus, we can identify and remove irrelevant and redundant features from the training dataset, reduce the complexity of the model by reducing the dimensionality of the input data, and improve the efficiency of the model [37]. Therefore, based on the results, we selected six logs (AC, DEN, CNL, K, TH, and RD) as input training features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the third artificial intelligence boom, machine learning has been widely used for lithology identification [23][24][25] and reservoir evaluation [26,27]. Machine learning methods for TOC content prediction include support vector machine (SVM) [28,29], Gaussian process regression (GPR) [30,31], extreme learning machine (ELM) [32,33], neural network [34,35], fuzzy clustering [36], and random forest (RF) [37]. Machine learning is data-driven, which improves the accuracy and efficiency of TOC prediction compared to conventional methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the artificial neural network (ANN) method to propose a new TOC model. The developed model was optimized to improve 52 TOC prediction SVM and RBF GR, AC, CNL, TH, U, K, PE, RT, and RHOB Huangping syncline basin in China Wang et al 53 TOC prediction nonlinear regression RT and DT logs Sichuan Basin in China Mahmoud et al 15 TOC prediction ANN DT, GR, RHOB, and RT Devonian Shale in America Zhao et al 54 TOC prediction nonlinear regression CNL Bakken formations in the USA Rui et al 55 TOC prediction SVM GR, RHOB, SP, DT, and RT Beibu Gulf formations in China Lawal et al 56 TOC prediction ANN XRD such as Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , CaO, and MgO Devonian formations in America Sultan 57 TOC prediction ANN and differential evolution DT, GR, RHOB, and RT Devonian formations in America Wang et al 46 TOC and S 2 estimations ANN NPHI, RHOB, DT, and RT Bohai Bay formations in China Handhal et al 14 prediction of TOC SVM, ANN, and random forest RHOB, GR, RLLD, DT, and NPHI Rumaila formations in Iran the prediction performance. Finally, an empirical correlation was proposed using the optimized ANN program to allow fast and direct application for the developed model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%