2016
DOI: 10.1108/lht-07-2016-0077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserving the digital heritage of public institutions in Ghana in the wake of electronic government

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine digital preservation of e-government in Ghana under the research question: what are the current digital preservation strategies being deployed across the ministries and agencies in Ghana? Design/methodology/approach Guided by a conceptual framework, underpinned by a quantitative approach, the paper uses the survey approach, to address the digital preservation strategies deployed across public sector organisations in Ghana. It underscores the link between the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Creation of more awareness on the intricacies of e-records management should be embarked upon. This has the support of Adu and Ngulube (2016b) in public institutions in Ghana. Preponderance of reports has corroborated these results.…”
Section: Factors Hindering Effective Management Of E-records In Fulsnmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…(3) Creation of more awareness on the intricacies of e-records management should be embarked upon. This has the support of Adu and Ngulube (2016b) in public institutions in Ghana. Preponderance of reports has corroborated these results.…”
Section: Factors Hindering Effective Management Of E-records In Fulsnmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Title Citations [34] Creating value through managing knowledge in an e-government to constituency (G2C) environment 65 [28] Information Sharing in and Across Government Agencies: The Role and Influence of Scientist, Politician, and Bureaucrat Subcultures 40 [44] Integrating knowledge management tools for government information 25 [27] Public sector readiness for digital preservation in New Zealand: The rate of adoption of an innovation in records management practices 13 [29] Technology as a tool of transformation: e-Cities and the rule of law 11 [43] Digital records keeping to information governance in Estonian local governments 9 [32] Archivists 2.0: Redefining the archivist's profession in the digital age 8 [45] Case studies on digital government 6 [31] Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads 4 [24] What lessons can be learned from the US archivist's digital mandate for 2019 and is there potential for applying them in lower resource countries? 3 [23] Preserving the digital heritage of public institutions in Ghana in the wake of electronic government 3 [25] The Issues and Considerations Associated with BIM Integration 2 Regarding the analysis of authors, as shown in Table 2, in 30 articles, there are a total of 61 authors/coauthors, showing a significant number of authors who participated in the digital government literature. However, according to Table 1, only two of these authors have more than one publication, showing few dominant authors in the digital government research.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studies reviewed in this study, such as Gbaje ( 2011), Kalusopa and Zulu (2009), Kanyengo (2006) and Keakopa (2006), revealed that there were no policies and guidelines on the preservation of electronic records in most of the African institutions and organisations and this differs from the findings of this study. Also, Adu and Ngulube (2016) observed that although preservation policies attempt to address the issue of accessibility to information and recognise the potential role of ICT on national development, very little has been done on digital preservation infrastructure in public institutions in countries like Ghana. The differences in the results may be accounted for by the fact that the academic library environment may differ from archival institutions in the way they treat preservation issues.…”
Section: Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%