2006
DOI: 10.1080/15325000500488602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primal-Dual Logarithmic Barrier and Augmented Lagrangian Function to the Loss Minimization in Power Systems

Abstract: This article presents a new approach to minimize the losses in electrical power systems. This approach considers the application of the primal-dual logarithmic barrier method to voltage magnitude and tap-changing transformer variables, and the other inequality constraints are treated by augmented Lagrangian method. The Lagrangian function aggregates all the constraints. The first-order necessary conditions are reached by Newton's method, and by updating the dual variables and penalty factors. Test results are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the Newton's systems (21) and (16) is the addition of the nonlinear terms ( ) from the right-hand side of (21), which cannot be determined in advance. In order to estimate these nonlinear terms, Mehrotra [4] suggests solving two systems of linear equations within each iteration.…”
Section: Predictor-corrector Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the Newton's systems (21) and (16) is the addition of the nonlinear terms ( ) from the right-hand side of (21), which cannot be determined in advance. In order to estimate these nonlinear terms, Mehrotra [4] suggests solving two systems of linear equations within each iteration.…”
Section: Predictor-corrector Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same year, the Primal-dual Interior Point algorithm with the predictor-corrector method [6] was used to accelerate the convergence of the problem. In recent years, most researches involving the OPF problem have been based on the variants of the IPM mainly with the predictor-corrector [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], and a few researches have been based on different approaches [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In [25] the modified barrier-augmented Lagrangian method [27], a variant of the modified barrier method [28], was used for the optimum selections of the transformers' tap positions and the voltage points of the generators, and in [26], the modified barrier (MB) method was used to establish the pricing mechanism for finding the equilibrium in an auction market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Com o uso do algoritmo PDBL de [1] e das ferramentas computacionais open source Java e NetBeans desenvolveu-se um software com o objetivo de resolver o modelo representado pela equação (6).…”
Section: Aplicaçãounclassified
“…Muitos trabalhos foram desenvolvidos na tentativa de resolvê-lo utilizando diferentes técnicas de Otimização Não-Linear, Linear e Métodos Heurísticos, entre eles citam-se: GRANVILLE [12], WU et al [22] e TORRES & QUINTANA [21] os quais aplicaram um algoritmo Primal-Dual Barreira Logarítmica na resolução do problema de Fluxo de Potência Ótimo e, as condições de Karush-Kuhn-Tuker (KKT) foram satisfeitas utilizando o método de Newton, sendo a maior dificuldade do algoritmo a escolha do parâmetro de Barreira; BAPTISTA et al [1][2][3] resolveram o problema utilizando uma função Lagrangiana Aumentada-Barreira Logarítmica; BAPTISTA et al [4] e SOUSA et al [18][19][20] utilizaram uma função Lagrangiana Barreira Modificada. Mais recentemente, lembra-se de CAPITANESCU et al [5][6][7] que analisa o desempenho de três algoritmos de pontos interiores e sua aplicação ao FPO.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified