2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-013-9489-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prior Knowledge and Online Inquiry-Based Science Reading: Evidence From Eye Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of eye tracking studies in the literature use static metrics such as fixation count, fixation duration or saccade length (Ho et al 2014;Kardan & Conati, 2012). Yet, some researchers are concerned with the sequential properties of eye movements such as the visual scan path (Lee & Wu, 2017;Susac et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of eye tracking studies in the literature use static metrics such as fixation count, fixation duration or saccade length (Ho et al 2014;Kardan & Conati, 2012). Yet, some researchers are concerned with the sequential properties of eye movements such as the visual scan path (Lee & Wu, 2017;Susac et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the relationship between eye-tracking and online news is unique in its shapes and concepts. On the surface, there are many factors in online news including congruity [36], reading behavior [48,49], content selection [50,51], attention and learning content [52], public opinion [53], and media platforms [54]. Next, there are also previous studies on the relationship between eye-tracking and anxiety.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They aimed to investigate whether students' level of prior knowledge (high and low) has an impact on their reading process. Results showed that both types of students spent more time reading text than graphics with a higher fixation duration on the graphic for the high prior knowledge students, which implies that the other students were struggling when reading a report that integrates both text and graphic information [39]. In the same context, Lee and Wu (2016) explored students' scan paths when reading geometric descriptions.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%