2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private forest owners' willingness to supply woody biomass in selected South-Eastern European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Households that had a relatively larger land holding were more likely to allot more land to the cultivation of acacia (Nigussie et al 2017 ), which may enable them to produce enough firewood to satisfy their domestic needs as well as sell surplus biomass in a hypothetical market. Holding all else constant, this would probably mean that these households have a greater incentive to participate in a biomass feedstock market as compared to those who are poorly endowed, simply because they have more resources to take advantage of economies of size in terms of producing biomass and selling it into the market (Curman et al 2016 ; Hand et al 2019 ; Qu et al 2016 ; Stjepan et al 2015 ). Conversely, according to key informants, the availability of such a market may also serve as an incentive for smaller land owners (e.g., land-poor farmers and women) to engage in collecting woody biomass from nearby open access forests (e.g., communal and natural forests), as has been the case for generations, instead of relying only on biomass from privately owned woodlots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Households that had a relatively larger land holding were more likely to allot more land to the cultivation of acacia (Nigussie et al 2017 ), which may enable them to produce enough firewood to satisfy their domestic needs as well as sell surplus biomass in a hypothetical market. Holding all else constant, this would probably mean that these households have a greater incentive to participate in a biomass feedstock market as compared to those who are poorly endowed, simply because they have more resources to take advantage of economies of size in terms of producing biomass and selling it into the market (Curman et al 2016 ; Hand et al 2019 ; Qu et al 2016 ; Stjepan et al 2015 ). Conversely, according to key informants, the availability of such a market may also serve as an incentive for smaller land owners (e.g., land-poor farmers and women) to engage in collecting woody biomass from nearby open access forests (e.g., communal and natural forests), as has been the case for generations, instead of relying only on biomass from privately owned woodlots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutan Rakyat adalah hutan tanaman yang tumbuh di lahan milik rakyat yang menghasilkan berbagai macam produk hutan seperti kayu dan non kayu (Puspitojati, Mile, Eva, & Darusman, 2014). Salah satu tujuan pembangunan hutan rakyat adalah untuk menyuplai permintaan kayu, sekaligus sebagai sumber penghidupan rakyat (Halder et al, 2014;Nichiforel et al, 2018;Quiroga et al, 2019;Stjepan et al, 2015). Hutan rakyat dikelola dengan berbagai cara, antara lain dengan tanaman monokultur, campuran kayu rimba, dan agroforestry (Lastini, 2012;Rodríguez-vicente & Marey-pérez, 2009;Sanudin & Fauziyah, 2015).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Beberapa kajian menyebutkan bahwa adanya kegiatan HKm memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap kualitas lingkungan. Pada aspek ekologi, peranan HKm dapat dilihat dari potensinya dalam penurunan erosi dan peningkatan serapan karbon (Rahayu dkk., 2010;Stjepan et al, 2015). Pada aspek ekonomi, HKm berperan dalam peningkatan pendapatan dan pengentasan kemiskinan (Maryudi dan Krott, 2012;Premono dan Lestari, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified