1996
DOI: 10.1149/1.1837058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile and Morphology Control during Etching of SiC Using Electron Cyclotron Resonant Plasmas

Abstract: The profiles and surface morphologies of etched SiC can be effectively controlled using electron cyclotron resonant plasmas. When high bias (100 V) is applied to the substrate, etching is anisotropic and smooth surfaces result, with the exception of trenches which form at the base of the sidewall features. In contrast, etching at low bias (8 V) is more isotropic with no apparent trenching, but results in textured etched surfaces and jagged sidewall features. However, the etched surfaces and sidewall features c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, a similar phenomenon has been noticed as the bias power was varied at relatively large DC bias. 11,17 Those previous observations are similar to the current one because the DC bias at 150 W is much larger than the one at 50 W, as shown in Table II. This is further supported by the variations in the surface roughness as the bias power was increased from 100 W to 150 W, as shown in Table I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fortunately, a similar phenomenon has been noticed as the bias power was varied at relatively large DC bias. 11,17 Those previous observations are similar to the current one because the DC bias at 150 W is much larger than the one at 50 W, as shown in Table II. This is further supported by the variations in the surface roughness as the bias power was increased from 100 W to 150 W, as shown in Table I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The surface roughness considerably decreases by about 0.299 nm with increasing the bias power from 100 W to 150 W. This behavior contrasts with the one observed in C 2 F 6 /O 2 chemistry 10 but is similar to the one noticed in an electroncyclotron resonance CF 4 plasma. 17 Effect of the source power on the etch responses are contained in Table II. The source power effect was examined at two different bias powers, 50 W Other source power, pressure, and gas ratio were set to 800 W, 6 mtorr, and 0.6, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microtrentching occurs at the base of the profile, as illustrated in Fig. 8, which is similar to previously observed ones [3,7,12,13]. The formation of microtrentching is typically attributed to enhanced ion bombardment by increased ion flux at the foot of the sidewall due to the depletion of ions impinging on the wall at low angles [14,15].…”
Section: Rf Bias Powersupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] With the advent of high density plasma sources, including electron cyclotron resonance (ECR), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), and Helicon, much higher SiC etch rates have been reported. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The key advantage of these sources is decoupling of ion energy and ion flux, so that relatively low ion energies can be employed. This reduces the electrode sputtering problem and in addition the plasma chemistries for high density sources generally involve gases that do not A number of F 2 -based plasma chemistries (NF 3 , SF 6 , PF 5 , and BF 3 ) were investigated for high rate etching of SiC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%