2017
DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2017.1292457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile of South African secondary-school teachers’ teaching quality: evaluation of teaching practices using an observation instrument

Abstract: The need for quality teaching is reflected in the poor performance of students in international tests. Teachers' practices and contextual factors could contribute to substandard quality of teaching in South Africa. Several studies indicate that successful learning is largely dependent on the teachers' practices in class. The focus of the present research was to profile the effective teaching practices of 424 secondary-school teachers in the Gauteng Province, South Africa. Teachers were observed by trained obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Estrategias utilizadas por los candidatos/as Diferencias en cada ítem entre aprobados y suspendidos para afrontar las oposiciones), se puede constatar que los candidatos/as priorizan el diseño de la programación y las unidades didácticas, otorgando especial importancia a la legislación vigente, el desarrollo de competencias, la visión interdisciplinar del currículum y la evaluación. Diseñar la programación en función de la legislación vigente parece una estrategia sensata y coherente (García, Esteve, García, Pérez y Sala, 2010). En el estudio también se expresan opiniones de los docentes acerca de la escasa concreción de los criterios de evaluación de las pruebas.…”
Section: Conclusiones Y Discusiónunclassified
“…Estrategias utilizadas por los candidatos/as Diferencias en cada ítem entre aprobados y suspendidos para afrontar las oposiciones), se puede constatar que los candidatos/as priorizan el diseño de la programación y las unidades didácticas, otorgando especial importancia a la legislación vigente, el desarrollo de competencias, la visión interdisciplinar del currículum y la evaluación. Diseñar la programación en función de la legislación vigente parece una estrategia sensata y coherente (García, Esteve, García, Pérez y Sala, 2010). En el estudio también se expresan opiniones de los docentes acerca de la escasa concreción de los criterios de evaluación de las pruebas.…”
Section: Conclusiones Y Discusiónunclassified
“…Related to this, the school needs to be redesigned to give each individual scope for the promotion of his or her own capabilities (in the sense of the capabilities theory of Sen (2010), Nussbaum (2011), and others) instead of affording the privilege of (rather narrowminded) socialisation as a student exclusively to a selected few. Research in South Africa has shown that individual differentiation of learners by teachers is much wanting (De Jager, Coetzee, Maulana, Helms-Lorenz, & Van de Grift, 2017). The overcrowding of classrooms results in teachers' being frustrated that they cannot give individualised attention to each child (Muthusamy, 2015), but in the US the Report by Colangelo, Assouline, & Gross et al (2004) identified lack of individualisation as eventually costing the country dearly in terms of unrealised potential.…”
Section: Rethinking Education and Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before such changes can become a reality in the South African and global education system, a vast amount of valid and reliable research needs to be done. Many valuable projects, like, for example the research done by De Jager et al (2017) cited above, have already been completed and are on the way. The challenges facing South African and global education scholarship can also be summarised as is the case with education praxis, by a three-part descriptor-the need to become relevant, responsive, and truly authentic.…”
Section: Education Theory and Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of questionnaires [51,53], portfolios [56] and rubrics [75] are proposed as evaluation instruments. Methods incorporating networks for algorithmic calculations and evaluation [63] are included, that incorporate hierarchical process analysis, decision making [71], analysis of relationships and interactions between teachers and students by identifying gaps [89], observation [93], training for co-evaluation based on criteria [75], self-evaluation [3], comparison of scales for teacher evaluation [24] and evaluation of practices through data mining [64]. From an evaluative perspective, the phenomenological [60] and evaluation with a formative approach [14], are included.…”
Section: Evaluation Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%