2013
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROmiRNA: a new miRNA promoter recognition method uncovers the complex regulation of intronic miRNAs

Abstract: The regulation of intragenic miRNAs by their own intronic promoters is one of the open problems of miRNA biogenesis. Here, we describe PROmiRNA, a new approach for miRNA promoter annotation based on a semi-supervised statistical model trained on deepCAGE data and sequence features. We validate our results with existing annotation, PolII occupancy data and read coverage from RNA-seq data. Compared to previous methods PROmiRNA increases the detection rate of intronic promoters by 30%, allowing us to perform a la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
137
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
137
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation, as proposed by Ozsolak et al (58) and Monteys et al (59), could be that a considerable percentage of intronic miRNAs [~35%, using miRBasev9 (58) and v12.0 (59)] are associated with Pol II or Pol III promoters that could drive transcription independently of their host gene promoter ( Figure 2E). More recently, Marsico et al (60), using their ProMIRNA tool (http:// promirna.molgen.mpg.de), detected up to 50% of intragenic miRNAs regulated by their own independent promoters (mirBase v 18.1). These authors also performed an analysis to identify the unique features of intronic miRNA promoters, such as miR-126 ( Figure 2E).…”
Section: Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation, as proposed by Ozsolak et al (58) and Monteys et al (59), could be that a considerable percentage of intronic miRNAs [~35%, using miRBasev9 (58) and v12.0 (59)] are associated with Pol II or Pol III promoters that could drive transcription independently of their host gene promoter ( Figure 2E). More recently, Marsico et al (60), using their ProMIRNA tool (http:// promirna.molgen.mpg.de), detected up to 50% of intragenic miRNAs regulated by their own independent promoters (mirBase v 18.1). These authors also performed an analysis to identify the unique features of intronic miRNA promoters, such as miR-126 ( Figure 2E).…”
Section: Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we will use an example to explain how machine learning methods can be applied to answer the questions presented above; in particular, where is transcription most likely to begin for a miRNA or gene of interest, and which CREs are most likely to be contributing to transcription at these locations? Examples of machine learning studies that specifically address the search for miRNA primary transcript TSSs in animals include Zhou et al (2007), Megraw et al (2009), andMarsico et al (2013). Morton et al (2014) provide a machine-learning based plant study addressing miRNA TSSs as a subcategory of Pol II TSSs.…”
Section: Using Machine Learning To Identify Elements Predictive Of Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the existing miRNA promoter recognition techniques, only the algorithms introduced by Marson et al 12 , PROmiRNA 14 and S-Peaker support predictions in mouse genome. Since source codes for miRStart and Marson et al 12 algorithms are not available, we have utilized their precompiled predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%