Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VII F Mts. Al-Qodiri 1 Jember dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pokok Bahasan Segitiga dan Segi Empat ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient

Hidayah, Suci Rohmatul; Trapsilasiwi, Dinawati; Setiawani, Susi

doi:10.19184/jukasi.v3i3.3517

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…AQ is an indicator to see how strong a person is in a problem [13][14][15][16]. AQ is used to measure how someone faces a problem, whether they will come out as a winner, retreat in the middle of the journey when trying to face a problem, or choose not to get the slightest challenge from the problems they face.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Profile of student's algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient

Sukmaningrum

Kurniasari

2022

J. Pijar MIPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One way to solve problems in mathematics is to think algebraically. Algebraic thinking is thinking using generalization abilities, transformational abilities, and global meta-level abilities to solve problems. A person's ability to overcome and solve problems is called Adversity Quotient (AQ). There are three categories in Adversity Quotient (AQ): climber, camper, and a quitter. This study aimed to describe the profile of students' algebraic thinking in solving mathematical problems in terms of Adversity Quotient. This research is qualitative research with the subjects of this research are three grade IX junior high school students with different AQ categories. The instruments in this study were Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaires, Problem Solving Tests (TPM), and interview guidelines. The qualitative data analysis technique follows the Miles and Huberman concept, which consists of three stages: data reduction stage, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. This study indicates that climber students perform all stages in solving problems and fulfill all indicators of algebraic thinking. Camper students did not carry out the re-examination stage in solving problems and only carried out generalization activities in algebraic thinking. Quitter students do not perform the steps in solving problems and do not fulfill all the indicators of algebraic thinking.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Profile of student's algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient

Sukmaningrum

Kurniasari

2022

J. Pijar MIPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This type is easily satisfied with what he can and does and sometimes ignores the possibilities obtained and belongs to the good AQ category (Alyani & Zahra, 2020). This is in line with the characteristics of the climber type AQ, which can use various solutions and has a persistent and courageous nature (Hidayah et al, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Using Geogebra Software Based on Adversity Quotient

Alyani

Putri²

2022

JPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to think critically is not balanced with the optimal learning approach, to the low achievement of mathematical critical thinking ability (MCTA). Quasi-experimental research with a quantitative approach was used to determine the differences in learning using GeoGebra software for the experimental and the control class on MCTA in terms of adversity quotient (AQ). Class XI high school students in one of the schools in Jakarta as the research population, with sample students of 40 from the experimental class and 40 from the control class selected purposively. The instrument is based on an assessment of MCTA and an AQ questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U Test, Spearman Correlation, and Cohen's d Effect Size were used to analyze the data. The results show the experimental class's MCTA is better than the control class. Based on Wright Maps, the AQ of climber-type students is dominated by the experiment class, while the control class dominates the quitter. The conclusion of this study, there are differences in the MCTA of the experimental class using GeoGebra software and the control class in terms of AQ.

show abstract

“…Berdasarkan uraian tersebut dan sesuai dengan UU mengenai fungsi dan tujuan Pendidikan sebagai sarana sosialisasi untuk membentuk mengembangkan kemampuan peserta didik sebagai generasi bangsa yang bersifat membangun, aktif, berkarakter, berintelektual tinggi, dan berpotensi positif untuk memajukan bangsa. Hidayah, dkk menyatakan meskipun sampai saat ini pelajaran matematika di jenjang sekolah menengah dengan jam pelajaran yang cukup banyak, realita menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas peserta didik yang belum memenuhi target yang sesuai berdasarkan tujuan pendidikan nasional [3]. Dengan demikian diperlukannya upaya pengenalan dan penggalian potensi diri peserta didik untuk diteliti sebagai penemuan baru yang bisa diterapkan adalah salah satu faktor penyempurna untuk menciptakan peserta didik menjadi generasi hebat.…”

unclassified

“…Adversity Quotient (AQ), juga dikenal sebagai ilmu ketahanan, mencoba mengukur kemampuan seseorang untuk menangani kesulitan dalam hidup [8]. Hidayah dkk menyatakan bahwa Adversity Quotient (AQ) adalah kecerdasan dalam pengolahan kesulitan dan mengubahnya menjadi sebuah tantangan baru untuk dipelajari dan diselesaikan [3]. Paul mengelompokan empat dimensi AQ bernama CO2RE, yaitu Control, Origin, Ownership, Reach, Endurance [9].…”

unclassified

Hubungan Adversity Quotient dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di SMP

Laili¹

2021

jhass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Masa pandemi ini sangat mempengaruhi perkembangan siswa dalam melaksanakan kegiatan pembelajaran sehingga harus melakukan pembelajaran jarak jauh. Siswa dikatakan berhasil mengikuti pembelajaran dengan baik dengan melihat hasil belajarnya. Adversity Quotient merupakan salah satu kecerdasan yang dimiliki untuk mengenali kesulitan diri sendiri dan mampu mengubahnya sebagai potensi untuk mengatasi kesulitan. Hal ini penting dilakukan mahasiswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran jarak jauh kali ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara Adversity Quotient dengan hasil belajar matematika. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII di Depok. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah survei dengan analisis data deskriptif. Pengumpulan data menggunakan media Google Form dengan menyebarkan kuesioner yang berjumlah 16 item pernyataan. Responden dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 130 siswa, dengan 61 siswa laki-laki dan 69 siswa perempuan. Hasil yang diperoleh dalam uji korelasi penelitian ini memiliki nilai sig. 0,000 <0,05. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan dan positif antara Adversity Quotient dengan hasil belajar siswa. Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes for Distance Learning in Junior High Schools This pandemic period greatly affects the development of students in carrying out learning activities so they have to do distance learning. Students are said to be successful in following the learning well by seeing the learning outcomes. Adversity Quotient is one of the intelligences possessed to recognize one's own difficulties and be able to change them as potential to overcome difficulties. This is important for students in distance learning activities at this time. This study aims to determine the relationship between Adversity Quotient and mathematics learning outcomes. The subjects in this study were 7th grade students in Depok. The research method used was a survey with descriptive data analysis. Collecting data using Google Form media by distributing questionnaires with a total of 16 statement items. Respondents in this study were 130 students, with 61 male students and 69 female students. The results obtained in the correlation test of this study have a sig value. 0.000 <0.05. It can be concluded that there is a significant and positive relationship between Adversity Quotient and student learning outcomes.

show abstract

Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VII F Mts. Al-Qodiri 1 Jember dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pokok Bahasan Segitiga dan Segi Empat ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Profile of student's algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient

Profile of student's algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient

Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Using Geogebra Software Based on Adversity Quotient

Hubungan Adversity Quotient dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di SMP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About