1996
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal tubal obstruction-is there a best way to treat it?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposed advantages of this approach are a decreased risk of adhesions and less disruption of cornual blood supply, and hence a greater likelihood that tubal function is preserved. Post‐operative term pregnancy rates of up to 56% with ectopic pregnancy rates of less than 10% 15,31 have been reported. In a more recent study, 120 women with proximal occlusion of one or both tubes treated by microsurgery had a cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate of 68% at 24 months 32 .…”
Section: Proximal Disease: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed advantages of this approach are a decreased risk of adhesions and less disruption of cornual blood supply, and hence a greater likelihood that tubal function is preserved. Post‐operative term pregnancy rates of up to 56% with ectopic pregnancy rates of less than 10% 15,31 have been reported. In a more recent study, 120 women with proximal occlusion of one or both tubes treated by microsurgery had a cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate of 68% at 24 months 32 .…”
Section: Proximal Disease: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Während bei auffälligem Befund die Indikation zur weiteren invasiven Abklärung als gegeben anzusehen ist, sollte auch bei scheinbar unauffälligem Ergebnis beachtet werden, dass vorhandene Tubenpathologien in Anbetracht berichteter Sensitivitätswerte von 65-69% [24,43] tatsächlich nur mit geringer Verlässlichkeit sicher ausgeschlossen werden können.…”
Section: Asherman-syndromunclassified