2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of CAST for early detection of problematic cannabis use in Spanish adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
2
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Uno de los inconvenientes a la hora de describir el problema asociado al consumo de cannabis es la gran heterogeneidad que existe tanto en la terminología empleada como en los instrumentos para su diagnóstico o clasificación. En relación con la terminología, hay autores que emplean como sinónimo de CUD, uso problemático de cannabis (Rial et al, 2022), uso de riesgo (Seidel, Morgenstern y Hanewinkel, 2020), abuso de cannabis (Legleye, Piontek, Kraus, Morand y Falissard, 2013) o dependencia de cannabis (Bastiani et al, 2013). Con respecto a los instrumentos, disponemos de muchos que nos permiten clasificar a la población en función de si presentan CUD y dentro de los propios instrumentos, existen diferentes puntos de corte para la clasificación (Carr et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Uno de los inconvenientes a la hora de describir el problema asociado al consumo de cannabis es la gran heterogeneidad que existe tanto en la terminología empleada como en los instrumentos para su diagnóstico o clasificación. En relación con la terminología, hay autores que emplean como sinónimo de CUD, uso problemático de cannabis (Rial et al, 2022), uso de riesgo (Seidel, Morgenstern y Hanewinkel, 2020), abuso de cannabis (Legleye, Piontek, Kraus, Morand y Falissard, 2013) o dependencia de cannabis (Bastiani et al, 2013). Con respecto a los instrumentos, disponemos de muchos que nos permiten clasificar a la población en función de si presentan CUD y dentro de los propios instrumentos, existen diferentes puntos de corte para la clasificación (Carr et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…It is a six-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale format, with a minimum value of 1 (Never) to a maximum of 5 (Very often). The CAST presents adequate psychometric properties of validity and reliability, and internal consistency that exceeds .80 in several studies and has been shown, through factor analysis, to be unidimensional, presenting adequate fit indices (Legleye et al, 2007;Legleye et al, 2013;Legleye, 2018;Rial et al, 2022).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second block collected information regarding the consumption of alcohol and other substances, both at the level of consumption and risk consumption. Items based on the ESTUDES (PND, 2019) and three specific screening tools were included, one to identify risky cannabis use (the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test, CAST, cut 4) (Legleye et al, 2013, Rial et al, 2022, another for risky alcohol consumption (the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, AUDIT, cut 4) (adapted and validated for Spanish adolescents by Rial et al, 2017) and another for drug use in general (the Substance Use and Abuse subscale of the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers, POSIT-UAS, cut 2) (adapted and validated for Spanish adolescents by Araujo et al, 2018). All three instruments presented a high internal consistency (Hinton et al, 2004), with Cronbach's alpha values even higher than those obtained by the original authors (AUDIT = .84; POSIT = .84; and CAST = .86).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%