2018
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.266.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purity through Factorisation

Abstract: We give a construction that identifies the collection of pure processes (i.e. those which are deterministic, or without randomness) within a theory containing both pure and mixed processes. Working in the framework of symmetric monoidal categories, we define a pure subcategory. This definition arises elegantly from the categorical notion of a weak factorisation system. Our construction gives the expected result in several examples, both quantum and classical. * Supported by EPSRC Studentship OUCL/2014/OAC. † S… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the identity map on a direct sum is not atomic and therefore not pure in the sense of [7]. Also, the adjoint of a pure map in the sense of [12,23] on a direct sum need not be pure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the identity map on a direct sum is not atomic and therefore not pure in the sense of [7]. Also, the adjoint of a pure map in the sense of [12,23] on a direct sum need not be pure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition is very general in that it can be defined for any generalized probabilistic theory [4], but it has the drawback that even a canonical map like the identity will not always be pure. Purity can also be defined in terms of leaks [23], or using orthogonal factorization [12]. These definitions work well when considering finite dimensional spaces with a well-behaved sequential product, but when considering more general quantum systems like von Neumann algebras, they fail to reproduce many desirable properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,7], and [9, Ch. 6], but also [10,11,16,17]). Effectus theory is a bridge between logic and CQM, and affine monoidal categories play a key role there (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other definitions of purity are those given by leaks [41], orthogonal factorizations [16] or dilations [45]. Without going into the details, these definitions of purity are in general not closed under a dagger operation.…”
Section: Puritymentioning
confidence: 99%