2006
DOI: 10.1080/00032710600867499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Levosulpiride in Human Plasma by High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant overlap of the plasma concentration-time profiles and the equivalence of the pharmacokinetic parameters suggest that the two formulations were bioequivalent and that the test drug was well tolerated. The obtained parameters were in accordance with previous reports [14].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Applicationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The significant overlap of the plasma concentration-time profiles and the equivalence of the pharmacokinetic parameters suggest that the two formulations were bioequivalent and that the test drug was well tolerated. The obtained parameters were in accordance with previous reports [14].…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Applicationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This procedure proved much simpler than previous LC-MS [20,21] and chromatographic methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The amount of plasma used (100 L) was significantly lower than that in previous studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]21]. Earlier studies had shown a relationship between the pH of the sample and the percent recovery of levosulpiride; more basic conditions (pH 11) resulted in a higher recovery of levosulpiride from the plasma [20].…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GC/MS techniques were reported early in the development of sulpiride and presented a low sensitivity of 50 ng/mL with time-consuming pre-column derivatization (Frigerio and Pantarotto, 1977). Several HPLC methods coupled with fluorescence detection (Tokunaga et al, 1997;Cho and Lee, 2003;Cho et al, 2004;Jin et al, 2004) and ultraviolet detection (UVD) (Bressolle and Bres, 1985;Koo et al, 2006) were developed. However, these methods possess disadvantages such as long analytical run times or back-extraction procedures for clear separation of levosulpiride, even though they presented sufficiently low lower limits of quantitation (LLOQs) of 0.25-10 ng/mL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%