1995
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rabbit medial collateral ligament scar weakness is associated with decreased collagen pyridinoline crosslink density

Abstract: This study was carried out to quantify the potential associations between material strength and both collagen concentration and pyridinoline collagen crosslink density in the healing medial collateral ligament of the rabbit and to compare these parameters with those of normal ligaments. The right hindlimbs of 24 skeletally mature (12-month-old) New Zealand White rabbits were subjected to a standardized 4 mm midsubstance "gap" injury to the medial collateral ligament. The animals were killed in groups of six at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
60
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since remodeled ligament tissue is morphologically and biomechanically inferior to normal ligament tissue, ligament laxity results, causing functional disability of the affected joint and predisposing other soft tissues in and around the joint to further damage. Some of the identifiable differences between remodeled matrix and normal ligament matrix include alterations to proteoglycans and types of collagen, failure of collagen crosslinks to mature, persistence of small collagen fibril diameters, altered cell connections, increased vascularity, abnormal innervations, increased cellularity and the incomplete resolution of matrix flaws [1,28,49,[50][51][52][53][54]. Although research suggests that persisting collagen abnormalities may be the most critical aspect of regaining ligament tissue function, virtually all other tissue components are likely to play equally important roles in tissue function, either directly or indirectly [46,49,[55][56][57].…”
Section: Ligament Response To Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since remodeled ligament tissue is morphologically and biomechanically inferior to normal ligament tissue, ligament laxity results, causing functional disability of the affected joint and predisposing other soft tissues in and around the joint to further damage. Some of the identifiable differences between remodeled matrix and normal ligament matrix include alterations to proteoglycans and types of collagen, failure of collagen crosslinks to mature, persistence of small collagen fibril diameters, altered cell connections, increased vascularity, abnormal innervations, increased cellularity and the incomplete resolution of matrix flaws [1,28,49,[50][51][52][53][54]. Although research suggests that persisting collagen abnormalities may be the most critical aspect of regaining ligament tissue function, virtually all other tissue components are likely to play equally important roles in tissue function, either directly or indirectly [46,49,[55][56][57].…”
Section: Ligament Response To Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after injury, fibroblasts primarily synthesize type III collagen, not type I collagen, which it produces to a much smaller degree [60,61]. The abnormal cross-linking of collagen and the smaller diameters in collagen fibrils in repaired ligament tissue cause weakness in both tissue strength and tissue stiffness, often remaining for months or years after initial injury [46,49,50,52,56,62,63]. In addition, evidence suggests that remodeled collagen fibrils are not packed as densely as in normal ligaments, and the remodeled tissue appears to contain materials other than collagen, such as blood vessels, fat cells, and inflammatory cell pockets, all of which contribute to its weakness [1,46,49].…”
Section: Remodeled Ligaments -Not Nearly As Good As Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the rat medial collateral ligament (MCL) used healing times on the order of 2 weeks typically, but some were as short as 1 week [2,4,7,13,14,16,22]. Studies of the rabbit MCL covered a large range of healing times from 3 to 104 weeks (2 years) [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11]. Likewise, studies of the canine MCL spanned 6 to 48 weeks (1 year) [12,15,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restoration of me-chanical strength is the goal of tendon healing. The ultimate stress and pyridinoline content are parameters closely associated with mechanical strength (Frank et al 1995, Woo et al 1997. In the present study, 1 and 2 weeks after the injury were selected for measuring these parameters because they had not yet reached the optimal level (Chan et al 1998a) and the effects of the growth factor could therefore be studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%