2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid switching kVp dual energy CT: Value of reconstructed dual energy CT images and organ dose assessment in multiphasic liver CT exams

Abstract: VUE images in the population had lower image noise than TUE images; however, a few small and hyperdense findings were not characterized on VUE images. Delineation of vascular anatomy was considered better in around a quarter of patients on MDI iodine (-water) images. Finally, radiation dose, particularly organ dose, was found to be lower with rsDECT, especially in smaller patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, VUE images have been demonstrated to have lower image noise when compared to true enhanced images, and, especially in smaller patients, rapid switching DECT showed lower radiation dose when compared to single-energy CT scans, even if misconceptions about the radiation dose from 2 simultaneous X-ray projections and questions regarding the accuracy of additional DECT reconstructions have limited the widespread clinical implementation of this technology. 21 As far as DSCT is concerned, the most widespread dosesaving protocols (retrospective acquisition with ECG-gated tube current modulation, SAS mode, and FLASH mode) carry advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, VUE images have been demonstrated to have lower image noise when compared to true enhanced images, and, especially in smaller patients, rapid switching DECT showed lower radiation dose when compared to single-energy CT scans, even if misconceptions about the radiation dose from 2 simultaneous X-ray projections and questions regarding the accuracy of additional DECT reconstructions have limited the widespread clinical implementation of this technology. 21 As far as DSCT is concerned, the most widespread dosesaving protocols (retrospective acquisition with ECG-gated tube current modulation, SAS mode, and FLASH mode) carry advantages and drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, material suppressed images (iodine subtraction) are not available for the GE image acquisitions. GE's AW server can generate several types of synthetic maps (i.e., material suppressed images) and other material density combinations, which has been utilized in other works 23,24 . However, that feature is not included in the clinical work‐flow tool, and thus requires manual processing which is impractical for a routine automated QC program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally available methods include MR spectroscopy (MRS), the dual-echo MRI method, CT measurements, and visual evaluation via ultrasonic tests. Among these, MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) has yielded the highest fat content [ 35 ]. Conversely, new quantitative methods have been developed for ultrasound tests, MRI, and CT.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Hepatic Steatosis Using Dectmentioning
confidence: 99%